I found Dawkins very hostile to people of faith in general. And although he may offer some good arguements, his attitude negates it and many of my friends who are not Christians also find him obnoxious and will not read anything he writes.
Bingo! He lumps people who practice religion in with people who just have a faith or belief, they are different. And his tone and attitude, he seems to me as scary as Fred Phelps. Wouldn't that be an interesting match?
As time marches on and advancements are made, many things that are now accepted as fact will be shown to be dead wrong, and many things that are now scoffed at will be shown true beyond the pale of doubt
This is often overlooked. Many scientists who were ahead of their times, had their lives and careers ruined by their peers and the "establishment". Human nature and group mentality, by any other name...
Well no, because atheism is not a belief.
What?
This makes me smile with incredulity, is it "your thoughts on...", or "your philosophy" or "worldview". what would you call it? And really, when we stop playing with words don't they pretty much have some degree of overlap in usage and meaning?
Atheists are NOT dogmatic regarding whether God exists.
ALL atheists, no. Many-Alot-Some, damn straight! The dogmatic ones are becoming like the opposite polarity of freaky-fundy christians, I do my best to stay way away from either end of that spectrum.
Do all atheists believe the same thing? No. Do all Christians belive the same thing? No. If you comprehend this, it will be apparent by your responses.
This concept of personal variability, could you call it individuality? is so important yet lacking.
Science can only postulate on physical observation, it cannot reveal what actually takes place. Scientific theories are only one means of understanding and explaining things. What is laughable to one belief system may be regarded as beyond question by another, and vice versa. It’s human nature. Many believe some scientific theories, but don’t swallow them all. Those that swallow all things scientific are worshippers of science. It is their religion, and scientists are their gods.
I've said that before, but not as well. I think we need to not harden our thoughts, but allow for a flexibility, allow questions-especially unpopular or un PC ones, only then can we make real progress.
Interesting arguments people, to those I quoted, thanks.