Narkissos
An admittedly simplistic argument (the best in this case):Are the 12,000 figure for each of the twelve tribes (Rev. 7:5-8) making up the 144,000 (v. 4) symbolical or literal?
How does the addition of 12 symbolical figures come up to a literal one?
I don't see how one cancels out the other. I think their reasoning is correct.
Are the measurements for the New Jerusalem, i.e. 144 cubits (Rev. 21:17), with 12 gates and 12 foundations, symbolical or literal?
Symbolic, I could'nt guess the literal application. I think that's something we'll find out later, post-Armageddon .........................................
Leolaia
You're reading a number into the text when there is none mentioned. You can infer a number from the singular article, but there is no parallelism between numbers. However the "Lamb" and the "144,000" are both figurative expressions.
I disagree, and I can't explain it better than they did. If it doesn't make sense to you, then it doesn't
Here is a rather goofy instance of this weak argument:
***
w60 6/15 p. 384 Questions from Readers ***Further, at Revelation 14:1, 3, we read of Jesus Christ as standing upon the mount Zion together with 144,000 others. The 144,000 would logically be as literal as the 1, making a total of 144,001 standing upon the mount. Besides, why give such a large and specific number if it does not impart information?
I believe its neither goofy or weak. Again, its logical and makes perfect sense to me.
............................................
To the both of you...What do you believe it means?