To those of you replying to "Re: Rebuttal to Amnesian's Post - Preface"
Do any of you who are accusing Amazing of being egotistical know how you sound? You all sound extremely defensive, like you are taking this whole issue too personally.
Have any of you noticed, when you buy a new car, how, suddenly, all you see are cars just like yours? This is very typical of humans to see the things we are most concerned with wherever we look. Hence, if we are concerned with male chauvinism, we see it everywhere. Even when it doesn't exist. In the over 30 years I've known Amazing he has never been a chauvinist. (I really don't think his mother would have allowed it anyway.)
As for being egocentric, (I'm still laughing about that one) Amazing doesn't have an egocentric bone in his body. I'm not even sure he has an ego. He is the most humble of men. I've never met any one who tries as hard, or harder, to do the right thing than he does.
Amnesian- In your 12 page post I see inteligence, wit, passion, anger and, yes, ego. Should I conclude that you are egocentric? Or should I realize that your passion and/or anger emphasize a 'normal' ego?
After reading your posts, I am left wondering if the points made by Amazing have hit a little too close to home. And now your defenses are up.
Oh yes. No. Amazing did not ask me to respond, nor does he know that I am responding. He certainly doesn't need me or any one else to defend him. I responded because I wanted to respond.