Posts by Fisherman

The clark street subway entrance inside the St. George, the promenade, Tower’s roof on hot summer nights, the grocery store that gave discounts with Bethel ID, the fancy chinese restaurant on Cadman Plaza where you could eat on chung for lunch days. About 5 or 6 bucks for shrimp meal. A lot of money.40% of the allowance you mentioned. The Squibb dining room had an awesome and breezy view of the harbor

15

The infinite loop of resurrection

by Nathan Natas in

scene: the new world, any minute now.... billy bastard, an aborted fetus is resurrected and immediately dies because he is outside the womb of a birthing person.. repeat ad infinitum.

Fisherman

SOCIAL|HUMOR?

There is a channel of an extremely beautiful woman who makes ridiculous clownish faces. I told her that flowers are not funny.

And neither is the demise of a human life or the execution of an evildoer.—Too bad.

“You kept neglecting all my advice And rejecting my reproof, 26 I also will laugh when disaster strikes you; I will mock when what you dread comes,” —A discarded fetus though bears no guilt or sin except inherited imperfection.

15

The infinite loop of resurrection

by Nathan Natas in

scene: the new world, any minute now.... billy bastard, an aborted fetus is resurrected and immediately dies because he is outside the womb of a birthing person.. repeat ad infinitum.

Fisherman

YHWY doesn't see unborn children the same as Christians

No Christians under law covenant which God used to protect Jesus’s lineage,

The issue raised here though is God’s power to resurrect an embryo because it died in a stage depending on its mother’s womb notwithstanding God’s ultimate justice,

15

The infinite loop of resurrection

by Nathan Natas in

scene: the new world, any minute now.... billy bastard, an aborted fetus is resurrected and immediately dies because he is outside the womb of a birthing person.. repeat ad infinitum.

Fisherman

Is this the same god who drowned his own children in a flood?

—And King David’s adulterine son. And all to be slayed at armageddon. Everyone, good and bad eventually dies one way or another sooner or later because of Adam’s sin.

Justice is God’s business. That is the reason for someone not qualified to be resurrected but not God being less than almighty.

15

The infinite loop of resurrection

by Nathan Natas in

scene: the new world, any minute now.... billy bastard, an aborted fetus is resurrected and immediately dies because he is outside the womb of a birthing person.. repeat ad infinitum.

Fisherman

dies because he is outside the womb

His life taken so cheaply and thrown out as garbage. Certainly if there is any justice and compassion in the world—and an Almighty God, he will see to it.

173

Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!

by Simon in

i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.

it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.

plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.

Fisherman

Who are you, I or the State to say to woman; "You WILL carry your pregnancy to term whether you want to or not". Does the State OWN women?

That is why the US government did not decide that a fetus living inside its mother has zero rights over its living mother living inside the USofA. But all the US is saying is that if a woman chooses to kill the human life living inside of her, the Constitution does not give her that right. Also, a doctor who is licensed by each State does the actual killing of the fetus at its mother’s will and insurance pays$ but States have authority to pass laws governing if and when a doctor can kill a fetus(aka abortion) and insurance companies may not want to pay. That is how laws work.

Factor in that Uncle Sam can force your donkey into a battlefield which can end a person’s life, and that each individual State already has authority to abort any person living inside the State based on its Penal laws ( aka the death penalty).

173

Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!

by Simon in

i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.

it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.

plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.

Fisherman

Interesting timing that the WT article today deals with mothers.

173

Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!

by Simon in

i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.

it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.

plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.

Fisherman

It should be up to each individual woman to decide what she wants to do ~~re abortions~~, with her own body.

But the baby inside her is not her body, it is a separate person a human life and Uncle Sam has decided that the Constitution does not give her the right to end it’s life. According to Uncle Sam, whether or not the mother is legally allowed to end her pregnancy with an abortion is a State subject matter although Uncle Sam does not guarantee the right to do so. It was previously held that under the previous interpretation of constitutional liberty a woman had the constitutional right to practice abortions with zero rights to the fetus but now the US government doesn’t feel that way. A woman is not at liberty to abort a human life because it is growing inside her body while she LIVES on US soil.

173

Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!

by Simon in

i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.

it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.

plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.

Fisherman

The argument I’ve heard is the words “liberty and pursuit of happiness” in the constitution which is the grounds for gay marriage and everything else under the sun including abortion. Based on this premise, if applied to abortion, a human growing inside its mother has zero legal right to life and its mother has life and death power over it because it is attached to her body. The government can legislate that an embryo has rights and proscribe doctors from performing abortions( except to save the mother) because a doctor is not inside the woman’s body, he is standing on US soil when doing an abortion. —To circumvent the law, a woman could take an abortion pill then go to a doctor to save her life. Sadly though, if a woman wants her child inside her to die, there doesn’t seem to be anything than can be done. Uncle Sam washes his hands and wants nothing to do with abortion because people are not at liberty to take a human life according to the now interpretation of the Constitution, it is up to the State to legislate when killing is legal. —Ultimately, you can’t force a woman to have a baby grow inside her body. Or maybe the government can force her somehow? I wonder how this is going to play out.