Abaddon,
Deary me, you aren't too clear on what you're talking about...
Yes I am. Its obvious what I am talking about.
I said I'd think of that as an alien, and you replied;
I replied appropriately and successfully preserved my position against the critique you gave.
Look, I don't mind you not knowing what you're saying,
I will keep that in mind if I ever dont know what I am saying.
but could you have the common courtesy to not make out such confusion to be my error?
If you are confused and its your fault its your fault. Please take some personal responsibility when you fail.
I also don't see what use comments like this are;
why are you on the computer and not spending all your time and money in your selfless fight to end human suffering?
Questions like that have the potential expose hypocritical attacks against God. What comment were you reffering to?
if you don't understand, ask questions, I'm more than happy to help...
I did and it doesnt seem that you are.
but you can stick your passive-aggresive ad homs right where the sun don't shine.
xoxoxo
Oh, yeah, first in line for what? Isn't that a little vain?
First in line for "A new way." No, its a little tribute.
Now this is in er, 'answer' to me speculating that a parent who could save their child from death but did not would be thought of as a monster...
Now if we insert an apostrophe into your sentence so it's at least grammatical (let's), it still doesn't make sense...
A resume (pronounced rez-uh-meh) is something in which your qualifications and experience are listed. Sorry if I am making it sound as though it is your fault for not understanding but it is. Please take some personal responsibility.
When I asked why and whether this would entail a series of gods worshipping each other, your answer isn't an answer;
An answer that is not an answer is certainly not an answer. But it was a bit of a rhetorical question which was in response to your rhetorical question so there ya go.
You then start to lie
No I dont, you do. You are the liar whose pants are on fire.
You make a claim that something is logical, and refuse to give your reasoning. Seems, just like your beliefs, we have to take your word for it...
You arent required to do anything. Stop acting like such a victim.
As for 'evidence won't satisfy you', WHAT evidence? YOU accept proof according to YOUR guidelines and accuse me of doing the same in reverse... very weird... and as my paradigm is an evidentary one (and yours isn't), you're also making a fallacious argument (no, that's got nothing to do with oral sex).
You get progressively more pathetic as your post continues;
You have already demonstrated who is pathetic and have yet to prove otherwise:
Hahaha. Yeah... make out it's MY fault, of course... how weak...
You are not concerned with understanding conlicting viewpoints. You wish to shut down opposing viewpoints.
Some one? Surely if you have some of something the something you have is plural so you would have 'some ones', unless you were asking a question, like if you were offering one to someone, which is what you meant, logic boy...
Moor bate ment to insite en eemoshunel response. You never give up, do you trolly?
And how have you excluded that possibility big boy?
When did I say I excluded it? (uh oh my answer was not an answer, Im going to get it now)
You only want to consider the possibilities that make you happy though.
Happy? There being a god who would communicate his divine plan to man would make me happy. There's just not evidence to support this belief.
Oh so you dont want to consider possibilites that do make you happy either. Ok.
So, that's another lie about me by you.
What lie?
... and you're Christian?
Bait sniffed and observed.
Oh, nice try with the Higgs Field by the way, where did you get it from?
What did I try?The Higgs Field is everywhere.
No cigar though
I dont want your exploding gag cigars anyway.
the Higgs Boson will be testable when we have the equipment to do experiments at 200GeV.
Ok but you do realise what a departure that is from using the analogy of gravity. Your argument lost its merit.
my point stands down to a theoretical level.
But that is the point. Its now on the theoretical level.
In terms of gravity's appearance in the realm of our senses, that makes total sense and is testable with stopwatch... which is the point I was making.
And I demonstated that there are things that cannot be tested and observed yet are logical to believe in. So I showed you that having an open mind is important in finding such elusive elements of reality.
Look Firsty, I am not saying I have THE answers, I'm trying to get you to explain your bland assurances.
You did not do that very well.
This is a discussion board; look it up. You say something, people react to it. If you want a statement board, well, start a weblog and don't allow people to make responses to your posts.
More bait.
I ask questions about what you say which you refuse to elaborate on.
No. I refuse to be baited by people that obviously dont want to have a real discussion and consider possibilities. You can start over anytime but you have yet to try. You are just digging yourself deeper.
Do you think I may have something to offer or are you intending to just slam what I say? Do you see how that might be an important prerequisite to such a discussion? You are interested in playing games and that is why you are still on this thread. To you it is a competition.
You called me a jerk on another thread. Obviously it's okay for you to be rude but not for other people.
On that thread you were being a jerk. What is it you want?
Errr... before I ever directed a word to you you were insulting me. Those are the facts.
I said you were being a jerk on another thread. You were being a jerk. If you were not being a jerk then I apologize but if you were take your medicine and get better.
