From L.A....big surprise...maybe he and that genius Sean Penn have been hanging out again talking politics.
I guess getting rid of an anti-American, terrorist-supporting (and come on - do you really have ANY doubts that he was more than happy to help ANYONE who was willing to do harm to this country) dictator is not in the best interests of this country? A dictator who most likely either a) shipped off his WMD or b) hid them in the vast Iraqi desert. Oh, I forgot - according to the news he didn't have them. Really? He used them on his own people and on Iran 15-20 years ago. I guess he, what, mellowed out in his old age and didn't try to advance his ability to wage war on everyone around him? Sounds plausible....
I guess ridding millions of people of the terror of random torture, rape, execution and chemical genocide is not a worthy cause. Maybe it doesn't affect my life, or yours, but that still does not make it 'wrong' just because Iraq is a poor country that will not benefit us in any way.
But then I guess if you take what the mass (liberal) media says at face value then perhaps you have skewed opinion of not only the war, but how the men fighting it feel about it. I've talked to upwards of a hundred returning active duty and reservists who as a whole are extremely unhappy with the way the media slants the war. They mostly feel good about what they did and state that the Iraqi people as a whole were extremely grateful and hospitable. Sure, there are some dissenters, but that's to be expected. These men and women do not feel that they were deceived. They all believed when they signed up (many after 9/11) that they would be fighting in the Middle East and that is why they signed up.
I support them because they are doing something that I am unable to do. I find it disturbing that someone would write an article this short-sighted and so obviously lacking in factual basis.