A strong case can be made for Maria Russell studying Ellen G. White's leadership success among the ADVENTISTS, applying it to the "faithful and wise servant" scripture for her own (and husband Charles) purposes.
applying it to the "faithful and wise servant" scripture for her own (and husband Charles) purposes.
___________________________________
Maria Ackley (Russell) was the driving force behind the invention of Russell's theology as a modern day "inspired" prophet!
___________________________________
At the death of Russell, Rutherford was all about preserving Russell's image, importance and "source authority".
She co-wrote, edited and oversaw Russell's earliest successful writings (Studies in the Scriptures) and defended him against
accusers (fraud, misrepresentation) by traveling around the world on his behalf. She believed in EQUALITY FOR WOMEN.
Unfortunately for her, Russell did NOT.
She spilled the beans on his mental cruelty and obtained a decree of permanent separation. *Note: not a divorce. Rusell hid his money and cheated maria out of her Alimony.
________________________
But, how could he, Rutherford, steal that for himself?
The only means that could possibly work was by absorbing the "source authority" for his own agenda.
Historically, Rutherford was a despot who ruled with an iron hand and dominated his readers. But, why would these date-setters accept his despicable personality and agenda in the first place?
Who were these people?
THEY WERE WHAT WAS LEFT after yet another Great Disappointment (Russell's death, 1914 non-Armageddon).
I assert these were person's disaffected with mainstream society and mainstream doctrine and mainstream religion!
These were rabid revolutionaries loaded for bear!
Rutherford's angry tirades against Government, Religion, Clergy and Societal Norms APPEALED to their radical psychology.
They were not primarily date-setters, but, easily manipulated revolutionary misfits disaffected and dedicated to strong leadership.
Hitler found similar people to dominate and lead in Germany years later.
Rutherford used what worked for Catholicism: the doctrine of Magisterium.
When the Church presents some doctrine as definitive or final, it comes under this protection, it cannot be in error; in other words, it is infallible. This is true even if the Church does not use the solemn ceremony of definition. The day to day teaching of the Church throughout the world, when the Bishops are in union with each other and with the Pope, and present something as definitive, this is infallible. (Vatican II, Lumen gentium # 25).
Rutherford did not call his source authority by this term, of course! He magnified the Maria Russell definition into his own version.
Russell, UNLIKE Rutherford, did not believe in ORGANIZATION.
Rutherford used "faithful and discreet slave" magesterium to build ORGANIZATION.