Posts by AlmostAtheist

i am gonna keep it as simple as this...please answer this simple one question to you who do not believe in intelligent design.. but wait...you notice how evolution leaves out all the obvious details about the human body..which leads to my question how did man and woman evolved???

well my bible says god put man to sleep and took one of his ribs..and made woman.

whats your non god explanation...lol..i,ll wait..i need a good laugh tonight..

AlmostAtheist

>> which leads to my question how did man and woman evolved???

Originally, there weren't genders. But over time, natural selection brought the genders about because it created an advantage over simple individual replication.

If my (ridiculously simplified) statement above were true, we would expect there to be essentially useless parts of the man that only have meaning in the woman and vice-versa. So nipples on a man make sense. The code to build them is there in both genders, but they only become useful in a woman.

BlackBoo -- If my statement above isn't true, why DO men have nipples?

Dave

12

Nature's harmonious timecube!

by SacrificialLoon in

something recently reminded me of the nonsensical rantings of the author of the timecube site.

http://www.timecube.com/.

if you don't believe in natures harmonious timecube then you are educated stupid!

AlmostAtheist

>> I suppose that is what you get with a worldwide web - really stupid websites and porn

Wait a minute! There's PORN on the worldwide web?

Why doesn't anybody TELL me this stuff?!?!?

9

Why does the Watchtower feel it needs to justify...

by B_Deserter in

...it's blood stance with medical reasons.

they've put out countless articles and brochures on the subject based purely from a medical standpoint.

i just scratch my head at this.

AlmostAtheist

I think the idea is to show that Jehovah "knew what he was doing" when he banned blood. "See? Jehovah's people have known all along how deadly and useless these things were, and now hospitals are trying to use bloodless techniques, too."

They conveniently leave out the stats on people saved by blood.

Even as a JW, B_D, I thought it was stupid to present "medical" reasons for our "scriptural" stand. But looking back now, I think that was the idea.

Dave

46

Whose name on here do you like...

by My Struggle in

jw
friends

there was someones name on here that i thought was great, but cannot remember what it is.. what are some of the better screen names?.

AlmostAtheist

"Cognizent Dissident" and "Cognitive_Dissident" are both fun ones.

"ASphereIsNotACircle" also rocks.

"Aude_Sapere" -- very cool.

"tetrapod.sapien", though it's hard to tell now if I like the name so much because of the poster.

Dave

38

"Making a case for 'intelligent design'"

by inkling in

the following guest editoral ran in a mainstream fairly liberal city newspaper:.

.

AlmostAtheist

>> their is no need to prove he exist..it is obvious he does.

Wow. Seriously, Man. Read that back to yourself. Wow.

Dave

64

Those who do not believe in intellient design and creation is brain dead!!

by Blackboo in

i am gonna keep it as simple as this...please answer this simple one question to you who do not believe in intelligent design.. but wait...you notice how evolution leaves out all the obvious details about the human body..which leads to my question how did man and woman evolved???

well my bible says god put man to sleep and took one of his ribs..and made woman.

whats your non god explanation...lol..i,ll wait..i need a good laugh tonight..