Here is and interesting quote regarding the ridiculous arguments of Jehovah's Witnesses. The article explains itself.
Questia Media America, Inc. www.questia.com
However, if the Christian Church contains tactless and misguided interpreters of God's message, for really dottiness you have to look at Jehovah's Witnesses.
In a groundbreaking operation, doctors in Leeds have carried out a kidney transplant between a man and his wife without either of them having a blood transfusion. This is because they are Witnesses and giving or receiving blood is forbidden by the Bible.
But not, it seems, giving or receiving kidneys. I asked a Jehovah's Witness friend to explain this bizarre contradiction and was told that although the Bible bans the receipt of blood, it doesn't say anything about receiving someone else's organs, so therefore it's all right.
Could that perhaps be because organ donation wasn't an available option among the Hebrews several millenia ago? But then, neither were blood transfusions. This suggests that God's edict, if you choose to accept it, had more to do with consuming blood than transferring it medically.
So following that line of logic, does that mean Jehovah's Witnesses are vegetarians? Well, actually, no. They might like a steak, but they leave the gravy.
While I'm pleased that the Leeds transplant couple have found a way around their dilemma of faith, the irrationally-selective beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses are as nutty as they come.
-1- belbab