I read the article and the whole time kept waiting for it to say - HAHAHA GOTCHA! I couldn't imagine that this drivel is really a WT Study article. It doesn't even rate second-grade english, maybe first-grade, with the reasoning of a first-grader. This is a STUDY ARTICLE, not optional material, and if this quality of writing/reasoning continues, they just can't stand.
As I read it, it is encouraging wives to stay with abusive husbands (of course, no mention of abusive elders), but shouldn't this get news coverage? First, discouraging reporting of sexual abuse of children, and now the "dusted off" update of Rutherford's exclamation that "women were only 'a stack of bones and a hank of hair.'"
Maybe it is an indication of the level of intelligence they are aiming for - dumbed dumbed dumbed down and stripped of all "natural affection". ~sigh