There is NO parrallel between Germany in the 40's and Terry Shiavo.
The people in concentration camps were there against their will.
Terry told 3 people should wouldn't want to be hooked up to machines or tubes. Doctors keep stating this is a form of "life support" whether you are administering oxygen or food, it's still a tube put in during surgery to sustain the life you can't support on your own. I have stated I wouldn't want it, why can't everyone believe her husband and her 2 friends who remember she said she WOULDN'T WANT IT? It's about HER CHOICE, not ours.
Someone can't breathe on their own so they surgically insert a tube to push air into you. Someone can't eat on their own so they surgically insert a tube to push food into you. What is the difference? You can't live without oxygen, you can't live without food.... they are equal forms of life support. In one you die very fast, in the other you die within days to weeks. Either way she is in a vegetative state which she said she WOULDN'T WANT.
Her parents are fighting for their wants, needs, and opinions. Not those of her daughters. Every single judge and court has sided with Terry and dismissed the parents. Doesn't this say anything?