Faith vs knowledge ?
I always maintaintained that they were one and the same , and I would quote my trusty "Aid " book p.1619 where it discussed John 4.24 and said "Such worship could not be based on imagination but woud have to conform to what is in harmony with the actual state of things, consistant with what God has revealed about himself and his purposes."
The apostle Paul, for instance "Proved logically" that Jesus was the Christ, he did not rely on faith and emotion (Acts 9.22)
So "The truth " has to be proveable truth on matters that are factual.. Maybe that is why I was able to seriously question it when the net showed many things that are just not so.
But to the committed dub who will not ask questions of the leadership, all "Wordly knowlege" is suspect. Scientists are atheistic tools of Satan unless they make statements in favour of W T doctrines, and "God has hidden these things from the wise and intellectual ones, and revealed them to babes" (Matt 11.25.) A useful verse to quote if things appear to be at odds with established science
So, Babylon captured Jerusalem in 607 bce, because the WT says it did The number of 144000 includes all the first century Christians and the remnant, because Brooklyn says so. The signs of the times are obviously here , despite an objective comparisom with history showing that terrible things happened in the past as well ... and so on
I guess if you want to believe it enough then it all makes sense
Edited by - BluesBrother on 26 September 2002 10:36:12