I think it?s all legal semantics. In the case of blood, think of all the families who could sue if loved ones died rather than be ?officially? disfellowshipped for taking blood products?and then the society reverses policy and allows a certain product to be taken at a later date? I believe the lawyers have told them that it?s better for the individual to make up his own mind and/or decision in such cases.
What chaps me is, the WTBS treats the people who want to walk/fade away by disassociating exactly like DF?d members??like fornicators and drunkards?, etc., THAT IS SLANDER!
Watchtower 1988 April 15 pp.26-31 Discipline That Can Yield Peaceable Fruit
Discipline That Can Yield Peaceable Fruit
14 The situation is different if the disfellowshipped or disassociated one is a relative living outside the immediate family circle and home. It might be possible to have almost no contact at all with the relative. Even if there were some family matters requiring contact, this certainly would be kept to a minimum, in line with the divine principle: "Quit mixing in company with anyone called a brother that is a fornicator or a greedy person [or guilty of another gross sin], . . . not even eating with such a man."?1 Corinthians 5:11.
Someday they will pay heavily for the breakup of families.
-BONEZZ