Bigboi,
Thanx for revisiting the original article. I do believe the judge saw the KIDS as victims, rather than the women, as continued irresponsibility by this man (term used extremely liberally) would only serve to further affect his children in a negative way.
However, I understand the points you have been trying to make. The author said as much when she stated that women basically have more choices when it comes to deciding whether or not to bear children. Of course the ultimate choice is to protect onesself if children are not desired, but if BOTH adults fail along those lines, then women have ALL the choices and men have NONE.
TY all for your comments.
I didnt mean for this to become a "who's right-or-wrong" when it comes to child support...LoL. That issue has to be decided in favor of innocent children.
I did, however see a dangerous precedent being set tho in a court deciding who should bear children. I saw another good point on this issue today. Suppose a poor couple, whose religion forbade contraception and abortion, had 9 kids, and barely the means to support them? Would mommy and daddy go to jail?
Food for thought,
Boozy