Og,
I agree with your comment:
So our best interests would be to reduce our dependencies on fossil fuels.
I wonder though, what will the left do in each case of alternative fuels?
When I was a pre-teen in school, we were told that nuclear energy would be the answer for the future. We were told that everything would be powered with a tiny capsule, and that energy would be so cheap that it would cost more to mail us our power and light bill than the actual cost of the fuel bill.
Protests ended any prospects of that becoming a reality.
What about wind power?
I was in California this past summer. Driving around the state I saw miles of wind mills, how long will it be before the left starts protesting all of the landscape being cluttered with machinery?
How about maybe extracting hydrogen from water?
You can imagine the protests about that. We would be using the worlds supply of water. We would be threatening the worlds safety, hydrogen after all is a very powerful substance. (Hydrogen bomb?)
I think we would get the same protesters and complaints no matter what kind of energy source the scientists came up with. It seems that with everything we use, as humans, there will be consequences, and there will be people calling us names for using it.
I do not have the answers but I suspect that neither does anyone else.
Borgfree