borgfree

Joined

• started 22 topics
• posted 768 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by borgfree

• 
  74

  So, will you be voting for Bush next time?

  by czarofmischief in

  1. social
  2. current

  .

  when the election rolls around, will you be pulling the lever for w?

  i will, unless somebody comes along with the offer of free supermodels for me.. czar

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  borgfree

  Yes, definately Coldredrain, Laura Ingrham too.

  Borgfree
• 
  74

  So, will you be voting for Bush next time?

  by czarofmischief in

  1. social
  2. current

  .

  when the election rolls around, will you be pulling the lever for w?

  i will, unless somebody comes along with the offer of free supermodels for me.. czar

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  borgfree

  George W,

  I really like Ann Coulter. I think you should make her your running mate next election.

  Borgfree
• 
  74

  So, will you be voting for Bush next time?

  by czarofmischief in

  1. social
  2. current

  .

  when the election rolls around, will you be pulling the lever for w?

  i will, unless somebody comes along with the offer of free supermodels for me.. czar

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  borgfree

  Reborn2002,

  I am sure you consider yourself moderate,but I wonder? The ones I know who claim to be moderate are almost always very leftist. There was a post by Spartacus sometime ago to determine where a person is politically, you should try it, I suspect you are not so moderate.

  http://www.politicalcompass.org/

  Borgfree
• 
  74

  So, will you be voting for Bush next time?

  by czarofmischief in

  1. social
  2. current

  .

  when the election rolls around, will you be pulling the lever for w?

  i will, unless somebody comes along with the offer of free supermodels for me.. czar

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  borgfree

  Actually I would vote for Rush for president, but he has no desire to be in politics. I do not know who I will vote for. I am not happy with all of the liberal courses Bush is taking. Most conservatives are against big government, but Bush has expanded government even more than a Democrat would have.

  I do however, hate the "big tent" of the Democrats. I am against most of the policies of those included in the "big tent"

  Borgfree
• 
  74

  So, will you be voting for Bush next time?

  by czarofmischief in

  1. social
  2. current

  .

  when the election rolls around, will you be pulling the lever for w?

  i will, unless somebody comes along with the offer of free supermodels for me.. czar

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  borgfree

  Sorry Reborn2002,

  I should have included the others.

  Lieberman

  Dean

  Gephardt

  Kerry

  Edwards

  Sharpton

  Graham

  Braun

  Kucinich

  All Democrats.
• 
  74

  So, will you be voting for Bush next time?

  by czarofmischief in

  1. social
  2. current

  .

  when the election rolls around, will you be pulling the lever for w?

  i will, unless somebody comes along with the offer of free supermodels for me.. czar

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  borgfree

  I voted libertarian last time. I am not sure this time. Here is what the Democrats are offering in the next presidential election, according to http://www.politics1.com/dems04.htm

  Warren R. Ashe (Virginia) no pic

  Donald P. Award (Connecticut)

  Jerry G. Beck (Missouri)

  Sanderson Beck (California)

  US Senator Joseph R. "Joe" Biden, Jr. (Delaware)

  James "Jim" Bollinger (Indiana) no pic

  Willie F. Carter (Texas)

  Patrick Cazneau (California)

  Retired Army General Wesley K. "Wes" Clark (Arkansas)

  Randolph W. "Randy" Crow (North Carolina)

  John A. Estrada (Nevada)

  Susan Fey (Colorado) no pic

  James I. Glover (New Jersey) no pic

  Albert "Al" Hamburg (Wyoming)

  Amanda Lou Hardy (District of Columbia) no pic

  Alfonzo Jones (New York) no pic

  Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. (Virginia)

  Glenn D. Leaverton (California) no pic

  Sherry A. Meadows (Texas) no pic

  Grady Dean Mollenhauer Jr. (New York) no pic

  Frederick E. "Fred" Ogin (Oregon)

  Fern Penna (New York)

  James J. Prattas (Hawaii)

  Adam Safran (California)

  Oloveuse S. "Ole" Savior (Minnesota)

  Craig E. Sharp (Texas) no pic

  Former Congressman James A. "Jim" Traficant Jr. (Ohio)

  Evelyn Louise Vitullo (Arizona)

  Lucian J. "Louie" Wojciechowski (California) no pic

  Here is the candidate the Republicans are running. Borgfree
• 
  24

  Ex-JW Convention at New Ringgold, PA

  by Yizuman in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  this is one you cannot miss!.

  october 17-19, 2003. hosted at.

  1 christian lane at blue mountain drive.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  borgfree

  Thanks Grace. But remember, no loud parties

  bfree

  PS What would the convention be without Grace?
• 
  24

  Ex-JW Convention at New Ringgold, PA

  by Yizuman in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  this is one you cannot miss!.

  october 17-19, 2003. hosted at.

  1 christian lane at blue mountain drive.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  borgfree

  I plan to be there. I hope my son and his fiancé can make it.

  bfree
• 
  15

  I have a question about the assemblies.

  by twolips in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  .

  when i was young (er) the society said the army came to the assemblies to observe how they fed the flock.. my question is, even though the asemblies were much more grander then now, with the food distribution ending and all, feeding thousands of people.

  now they bring their own lunches.......i regress...does anyone remember how the military was in awe of us?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  borgfree

  I don't know about "in awe", but I do remember the military coming to the international convention in NY to observe how the cafeteria served so many people so quickly.

  Borgfree
• 
  44

  How would you tackle the North Korean problem?

  by JH in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you were the president of the us, would you confront north korea or would you try to make a deal with them to reduce tensions.. north korea warns us: we can produce six atom bombsby rupert cornwell in washington.

  16 july 2003 .

  the crisis over north korea's nuclear weapons programme deepened yesterday as the north claimed it had made enough plutonium for six atomic bombs, and a former us defence secretary warned that the two countries could be at war by the end of the year.. the latest claim from pyongyang was communicated to the bush administration last week, three months after north korea said it was beginning to reprocess 8,000 spent nuclear fuel rods that were under united nations seal until the un inspectors were ejected from the country at the end of 2002.. us intelligence agencies are now trying to determine whether the boast is true or merely another bluff by the reclusive stalinist regime.. either way, the declaration has pushed the us president a step nearer deciding whether to accede to north korea's demand for direct negotiations - and thus drop his previous insistence that he would never bow to "nuclear blackmail" - or to accelerate plans for a military strike against the north's nuclear installations.. that spectre was raised yesterday by william perry, defence secretary under president clinton, when he told the washington post that the bush administration was "losing control" of the situation.. mr perry is a specialist on korea who helped prepare the military action which mr clinton came close to launching against yongbyon and other key north korean sites in 1994. he now fears that the north is not only close to a nuclear test to show the world it is a nuclear power, but also that it could sell a weapon to a terrorist group for use against the us.. "the nuclear programme now under way in north korea poses an imminent danger of nuclear weapons being detonated in american cities," mr perry said, adding that he had reached that conclusion after talks with bush officials in washington, and with senior figures in china and south korea.. china, reckoned to have the greatest leverage over of kim jong il's renegade state, launched a new effort this week to draw the north into regional talks to defuse the crisis, but mr perry told the washington post that as far as he could see, the "diplomatic track is inconsequential" and going nowhere.. the korean crisis has been largely ignored as washington has focused almost exclusively on iraq.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  borgfree

  Sounds like deja vu all over again.

  Chamberlain's Treason

  By Robery Dell

  The Nation
  March 12, 1938
  Vol. 146, No. 11, P. 292-294

  Geneva, February 22

  1. The week that began with Hitler's ultimatum to Austria and ended with Anthony Eden's resignation was surely the most important week in the post-war history of Europe. The events of the past five years reached their climax. The successful bluff and blackmail of the fascist powers on the one hand and the incapacity and poltroonery of the Western democratic powers on the other produced a situation in which the British government had to choose between loyal cooperation with France and Russia to save Europe from fascism and adhesion to the fascist bloc. Neville Chamberlain chose the latter alternative. Eden, to his honor, refused to be a party to it. We cannot but regret that he did not make this choice in 1935 when the British government capitulated to Mussolini, but he has wiped out his weaknesses of the last two years by an act of courage which shows that he is made of stouter stuff than some of us had believed. ............

  http://newdeal.feri.org/nation/na38146p292.htm

  Borgfree