DakotaRed, You quoted:
" Paradoxically, traditional theology has attributed to Jesus the claim to be God, a blasphemy which he discounted by asserting his claim to be the Son of God.To be the Son of God was to demonstrate perfect obedience to the Father
There were times when Jesus was worshipped. Jesus did not tell the worshippers “don’t do that, worship God alone” Would His not doing so, be, at the least, disrespectful to God? Unless, He was fully entitled to such worship?
"The meaning of words must be sought within the environment in which they were written. The Bible was not composed in the 20th century, nor did it's writers know anything of the subsequent creeds and councils.
A Christian believes, the author of the bible is God, Himself. A Christian would not be as concerned with how an analyst views the wording of the bible, since God would make sure the instructions He wanted conveyed would be conveyed.
Jesus never referred to himself as God.
That statement is debatable, some think that by using the term “Son of God” He was showing He was divine. I think the Jews viewed His words just that way. That is why they wanted to stone Him, for “making Himself like God”
The words ho theos (i.e. the one God), used absolutely, are nowhere with certainty applied to Jesus."
I was at a lecture once, where the speaker demonstrated, from the scriptures, that there were indeed scriptures where ho theos was used for Jesus. I do not have the time to search for that information, but at the time, I did follow along with his argument, and was convinced that ho theos did apply to Jesus, as well as the Father.
I think there are some on the forum who could probably cite those scriptures.
Borgfree