Cases from 32 years ago cannot be extrapolated to today in the sense the dubs seem to be taking it. Technology is so different.
This 2012 (Not News!) article discusses reviewing outcomes from a very large sample population over several decades.
I noticed Colleen Koch wrote another article that appears (by its title) to be showing opposite results in a different population.
I get it, dubs are looking for external validation of their doctrines, because ya know, they need Satan's System Of Things to say they're right, or something. But they shouldn't cherry pick one article and not even look at the study design and what the results actually mean.