freyd

Joined

• started 30 topics
• posted 299 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by freyd

• 
  19

  IS/ WAS YOUR CONGREGATION LIKE MY CURRENT ONE?

  by enlightenedcynic in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  in the congregation i currently attend with my die-hard witness wife and my two kids, the p.o.

  is a lame duck elder whom no one really respects or goes to for any counsel, advice, etc.

  another elder(lives at bethel) has taken to flirting with a local sister who is seperated but not divorced from her husband.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  freyd

  Reminds me of my old congregation. You wouldn't believe it. For starters they had three PO's in three years.
• 
  97

  1874 a date the Lord chose?

  by lovelylil in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this interesting statement was made on a bible student forum and sent to me by one of my friends.

  i have copied it the same way he sent it to me.

  here a bs is explaining how the lord himself chose the date 1874 as his "invisible return".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  freyd

  Appreciate your understanding, Lil. While it's true that dubs say that Matt 24:45 applies to the GB, it just shows now far they have drifted from Truth when their own founder, JF Rutherfraud said that CTR was the FWS and yet while they claim CTR was the JW founder, the R&F are strongly discouraged from reading what he wrote that's in the KH libraries. The Studies in the Scriptures are looked upon like relics much the way Catholics view the Bible. In both cases there is a self-appointed counterfeit priesthood that must be given total allegiance to the extent that neither claim inspiration but must be treated as infallible. The problem is that Matt 24:45 refers to an end time individual, not a group of priests, pope or GB.
• 
  23

  Has anyone posted or delivered the "SILENTLAMBS SERVICE BULLETIN"YET?

  by wozadummy in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  silentlambs has posted a bulletin about the jw pedophile database opening and done it nicely commenting on the new society tract.

  has anyone any experiences yet as i've printed a heap out and will be delivering them soon around my area to alert my neighbours of the hypocrisy of the society?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  freyd

  SILENTLAMBS SERVICE BULLETIN Jehovah’s Witnesses Forced To Open Pedophile Database! www.silentlambs.org - 877-WTABUSE (982-2873) Recent decisions in California Courts have ruled in favor of abuse survivors in that state. The Legal Department lawyers of Jehovah’s Witnesses have fought with filing after filing trying to claim “clergy penitent privilege” with information that would lead to the possible conviction or implication of further crimes against children by Jehovah’s Witness child molesters. The secondary issue regards civil damages brought upon victims due to negligence of church officials in not reporting allegations of child abuse putting additional children in danger. This ruling from the court states simply that the church cannot use “clergy penitent privilege” as a way to protect pedophiles from law enforcement. The ruling further states information stated in judicial hearings of Jehovah’s Witnesses as well as documents generated by those hearings are not “privileged” and will have to be released to the courts as any information that is relevant to the case. In addition, the Legal Department will have to produce all documents related to their abuse policy and how they investigate child abuse allegations. Most importantly the ruling states; “records kept by or under the direction of the Legal Department concerning allegations of abuse,” that directly involves the pedophile database reported by silentlambs in April of 2002. This represents the first official ruling of the court that opens the database for public scrutiny. This judgment is bitter sweet as in 2003 in New Hampshire silentlambs officials watched as Jehovah’s Witnesses attorneys defended the “religious right” of convicted child molester Paul Berry to prevent further convictions on allegations of his abuse of other children. Thousands of dollars in donations to Jehovah’s Witnesses known as Worldwide Work monies were spent silencing the victims of Paul Berry. Each time you donate to Jehovah’s Witnesses a portion of that money will be spent defending the rights of convicted Jehovah’s Witness pedophiles from their victims. The California case above to date has involved hundreds of thousands of dollars of Jehovah’s Witness donations to stop victims of abuse from getting needed treatment for the crimes committed against them. The religious hypocrisy of offering articles on abuse issues while secretly protecting pedophiles using “clergy penitent privilege” is far worse than the Catholic Church abuse scandal. This month the Jehovah’s Witnesses are distributing this tract worldwide. They openly condemn the Catholic Church for their abuse scandal and use it as a basis to call them and all other faiths “false religion.” Do members realize their Legal Department Lawyer elders are protecting pedophiles in the courts using the money they collect door to door to do so? At silentlambs we appreciate the determination and courage of abuse survivors in going forward in the courts to bring these criminals to justice. We look forward to the day when the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses follows the example set by the Pope of the Catholic Church and apologizes for their role in allowing policies that continue to hurt children. The truth will prevail and no amount of Worldwide Work Donations spent to protect child molesters will stop the real truth of these matters from being discovered in the courts. The pedophile database holds the key to that “truth.”
• 
  97

  1874 a date the Lord chose?

  by lovelylil in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this interesting statement was made on a bible student forum and sent to me by one of my friends.

  i have copied it the same way he sent it to me.

  here a bs is explaining how the lord himself chose the date 1874 as his "invisible return".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  freyd

  Well that's not true. How about Matt 24:45
• 
  97

  1874 a date the Lord chose?

  by lovelylil in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this interesting statement was made on a bible student forum and sent to me by one of my friends.

  i have copied it the same way he sent it to me.

  here a bs is explaining how the lord himself chose the date 1874 as his "invisible return".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  freyd

  I said I was an x-dub, what else did you want to know? I've answered you scripturally and from the SITS which unlock the understanding of Scripture but that you cannot understand unless you've been called to be in the Kingdom as a co-ruler.
• 
  97

  1874 a date the Lord chose?

  by lovelylil in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this interesting statement was made on a bible student forum and sent to me by one of my friends.

  i have copied it the same way he sent it to me.

  here a bs is explaining how the lord himself chose the date 1874 as his "invisible return".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  freyd

  Remember how Jesus taught people to pray? It wasn't thru him. And who were those people? R U baptized into Jesus death? Or are you baptized into an organization? This is getting off the subject.
• 
  97

  1874 a date the Lord chose?

  by lovelylil in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this interesting statement was made on a bible student forum and sent to me by one of my friends.

  i have copied it the same way he sent it to me.

  here a bs is explaining how the lord himself chose the date 1874 as his "invisible return".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  freyd

  Same thing exists today among BS.
• 
  97

  1874 a date the Lord chose?

  by lovelylil in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this interesting statement was made on a bible student forum and sent to me by one of my friends.

  i have copied it the same way he sent it to me.

  here a bs is explaining how the lord himself chose the date 1874 as his "invisible return".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  freyd

  Matt 24:28...."for wherever the carcase may be, there shall the eagles be gathered together." If you're called fine, if not you have access to God by means of Christ.
• 
  97

  1874 a date the Lord chose?

  by lovelylil in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this interesting statement was made on a bible student forum and sent to me by one of my friends.

  i have copied it the same way he sent it to me.

  here a bs is explaining how the lord himself chose the date 1874 as his "invisible return".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  freyd

  We understand that we're not to be taken seriously by most. We're in the process of completing the Church, not in gaining converts which we justify like the WT in numbers that God is on our side.
• 
  97

  1874 a date the Lord chose?

  by lovelylil in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this interesting statement was made on a bible student forum and sent to me by one of my friends.

  i have copied it the same way he sent it to me.

  here a bs is explaining how the lord himself chose the date 1874 as his "invisible return".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  freyd

  Too funny I agree. We have not removed Jesus. You must understand justification. It is by God which applies only to the church who have no need of a mediator. The rest of the believers who are not justified do. Study the Divine Plan. Bibletoday.com