never!!!
!.
Here are my list of requests before I would consider JW's as a religious choice
1 - stop protecting pedofiles and start mandatory reporting to police of all allegations
2 - stop advocating medical suicide
3 - stop emotional blackmail via extreme shunning
4 - start advocating education for children
5 - start being honest about their doctrine
6 - start paying tax
Once they have done all that I would consider going back - it would be a brief consideration, but I would consider it :-)
nice enough gentleman.
the parts were pretty watered down.
mom asks him if he is ready.....did he clean off all the dirt?
http://www.census.gov/popclock/
Ye - Jehovah prefers to wait another day and kill an extra 200,000 people...
"albert" was 55 years old, and the fifth-born of seven children.
i am the second oldest and babysat him often while he was growing up --- and while i was still at home.. yesterday, albert was out taking his usual morning stroll around his small town, when he collapsed on the sidewalk.
the doctors said it was a heart attack.
sorry to hear for your loss - 55 is too young...try and find the silver lining - I see you found 7 positive things already.
were you a born in or a convert?.
i loved science so naturally the conversation centered around the topic of evolution.
they placed with me the book did man get here by evolution or by creation?
thank you reopened mind - very poignant
sorry to hear about your children and grandchildren - try and find the silver lining :-)
was just looking at how many articles the wt put out around the time when al gore was pitching the global warming bs for his nwo (new world order) friends.. .
http://nypost.com/2013/12/05/global-warming-proof-is-evaporating/.
wt would rather jws to:.
agreed cantleave - there is a "its snowing near my house" approach to climate change from some folks.
in this case the OP is leading with global warming and I'm happy to go with that.
climate change was of course famously recommended as the preferred term over global warming by the Republican spindoctor Frank Luntz back in 2003 - lambsbottom obviously never got the Luntz memo - which can you read in the link below
Further reading : http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2003/mar/04/usnews.climatechange
was just looking at how many articles the wt put out around the time when al gore was pitching the global warming bs for his nwo (new world order) friends.. .
http://nypost.com/2013/12/05/global-warming-proof-is-evaporating/.
wt would rather jws to:.
Global warming is the rise in the average temperature of Earth's atmosphere and oceans since the late 19th century and its projected continuation
Climate change is a significant and lasting change in the statistical distribution of weather patterns over periods ranging from decades to millions of years.
Easy to get buried in the detail of the difference, but for all practical purposes the terms can be used interchangably.
Hope that helps everybody. Source: wikipedia.
was just looking at how many articles the wt put out around the time when al gore was pitching the global warming bs for his nwo (new world order) friends.. .
http://nypost.com/2013/12/05/global-warming-proof-is-evaporating/.
wt would rather jws to:.
@lambsbottom - waiting with bated breath for 'natural causes' definition
so, with the ice storm hitting texas does this mean that they will now accept climate change is real?.
or will they just try firing guns at the clouds ....
Maybe Rick Perry will declare 3 days of prayer for drought to come back :-(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Days_of_Prayer_for_Rain_in_the_State_of_Texas
was just looking at how many articles the wt put out around the time when al gore was pitching the global warming bs for his nwo (new world order) friends.. .
http://nypost.com/2013/12/05/global-warming-proof-is-evaporating/.
wt would rather jws to:.
@lisa - I also prefer reality. When it comes to claiming 'natural causes' are responsible for climate change, I think that deserves more exploration.
was just looking at how many articles the wt put out around the time when al gore was pitching the global warming bs for his nwo (new world order) friends.. .
http://nypost.com/2013/12/05/global-warming-proof-is-evaporating/.
wt would rather jws to:.
@lambsbottom
I believe that 'global warming' is simply 'natural' changes to enviroment that come and go through the centuries.
Maybe you can expand on what you mean by 'natural changes' please?
Climate science accepts there has always been natural change in climate. Climate is known to respond to the biggest influence on it at any one time. It doesn't have a mind of it own to just wiggle back and forth between hot and cold extremes, like some sort of self-propelling pendulum. Those natural influences could be the sun, volcanoes, planetary cycles in various relative intensities.
What particular 'natural cause' are you claiming is responsible for the current change in climate?
Further reading - http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/sep/23/climate-science-magical-thinking-debunked-by-science
