This has always been a sore spot with me. Especially at the WT study. Some illiterate whose only reading fare are the Society Pub.s and the TV Guide will expound like an expert while simply parroting the paragraph. In this case, the "Dr. Spock" recantation.
Let's put the matter to rest. In one of his more recent books, Spock categorically denied ever publicly apologizing for ruining a generation of kids. It simply never happened.
Here is what happened. During the late sixties, the anti-war movement was gaining momentum. One of the more prominent participants was Dr. Spock. Hey, what better advocate for speaking out to prevent the needless deaths of thousands of young men than the Doc who helped so many moms raise them?
This did not sit well with the "establishment". The Right Reverend Norman Vincent Peale (emphasis on "the Right"), in his newspaper column, provided parents with a scapegoat for why their teenagers had turned into "long-haired, hippy, dope-smoking, draft-dodging, free-loving peaceniks." It was all the fault of that darn old Dr. Spock, he made parents too lenient with their kids, and now we have this generation of agitators.
Soon after that, the late, great Spiro Agnew, vice president to Richard Nixon, (two honest, law-abiding representatives of "the establshment") took the text of this article, and used it as a major point is political speeches around the country.
Hence, the accusation becomes "fact": Dr. Spock was responsible for a nation of brats. The story that he apologized was a tacked on urban legend.
Dr. Spock, in fact, never apologized for anything of the kind. His book is still a best seller world wide.
What many people dont't realize now is how revolutionary his ideas about child rearing were, especially in 1946.
"Trust yourself, you know more than you think you do." Simple advice that helped a lot of moms.
His views on child correction were seen as permissive, and probably are still seen that way by many JW's who are quick with the old "Rod of Correction."
So, when the Society tells this anecdote, they are really paraphrasing N.V.Peale, a member of Christendom. And they don't even bother to show the reference; Those plagiarists!