here is the link to:.
february 1st 2008 public edition of the watchtower.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/xdgzln.
Page 13 paragraph 4
Indeed, Jesus has been given "the name that is above every other name."
They quote their own NWT translation of Phil 2:9 and do not put brackets around the word "other" which they do in the NWT. The word other appears nowhere in the greek text and should be bracketed.
i am sick and tired of this argument with witnesses.
every time i try to talk to anyone about anything jw related, this is the response, "but no one else is preaching the good news door to door...".
the jw version of the good news is nothing but amway or electrolux or kirby!.
The WTS actually is a bit deceptive in their renderings.
Please notice the two verses below from the NWT:
| Acts 2:46 And day after day they were in constant attendance at the temple with one accord, and they took their meals in private homes and partook of food with great rejoicing and sincerity of heart, </form> |
and Acts 20:20
| while I did not hold back from telling YOU any of the things that were profitable nor from teaching YOU publicly and from house to house. </form> |
The NWT renders the same Greek as "in private homes" in 2:46 because they don't want members to see that house to house is speaking of churches in one's home. Paul in his writings speaks many times of churches in members homes. If they were to render Acts 2:46 as house to house, the context make sit obvious that these first century Christians were not going to each and every home breaking break. Thus they render it as in private homes so one doesn't see its meaning...while leaving 20:20 as house to house...and claiming it means knocking at doors of each house in a row of houses.
i heard that a notice was sent to all boe this month removing "keep on the watch" as the featured january campaign.. can i get confirmation from anyone?.
confirmed. My mom's friend just told her it hasnt yet been announced at her hall but her study conductor told her. He refused to tell her why it was canceled though
Romans ch 14...as well as
Colossians 2:16
Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]:
friends,.
i just confirmed the "generation" change from another forum in portuguese.
the following is the text in portuguese:.
yes ...page 265 of CofC says:
The leadership had made numerous adjustments and now had
few remaining options. There was the 1957 starting date for “this
generation” proposed by members Schroeder, Klein and Suiter, but
that seemed an unlikely choice. ((((((There was Albert Schroeder’s idea
of applying the phrase to the ‘‘anointed’’ class (an idea that had been
floating around the organization for many, many years) which offered
certain advantages—there are always additional persons (some fairly
young) who each year decide for the first time that they are of the
“anointed” class.))))))) So this would offer an almost....
So it was discussed in the late 70's/possibly 1980 but not adopted. Instead generation was just extended to include anyone born in 1914, as opposed to those who could remember the events of 1914. Even if the JW wants to assert that Ray is a liar or an apostate, the fact is he wrote this in 1983 or so. How would he have know this "light" unless it was turly discussed.
as you may have heard, the court of appeal has overturned three previous court decisions in my favour.
the lawsuit has been given the green light and is basically has remained intact almost exactly the way it started.
what are the odds of that happening?
on sencond thought I agree with you Bobbi...pls disregard my original post
as you may have heard, the court of appeal has overturned three previous court decisions in my favour.
the lawsuit has been given the green light and is basically has remained intact almost exactly the way it started.
what are the odds of that happening?
Bobbi
If you had any question as to Mr Hughes integrity that should have been addressed to him directly in a PM as opposed to open forum like such....unless you have any conclusive evidence to support your claims beyond just your own thoughts.
This is not intended to be a confrontational post. Please just consider.
insight on the scriptures volume 1: aaaron-jehoshua (copyright 1988 wts).
"jesus indicated that people of sodom and gomorrah would experience a resurrection to stand for judgement.".
compared to:.
They teach that we are saved by God's 'undeserved kindness" while at the same time teaching you must do the works they prescribe for you as much as you can and hope to be found worthy of life by Jehovah on judgment day.
as i recall reading in the flock book (maybe i overlooked it).
it is not actually a dfing offense.
it may be "looked down upon" but can you be df'ed?
there is a 2001 WT QFR that states if an unbelieving spouse reuqts/demands your presence at a celebration/holiday gathering it is up to one's conscience wheter or not to attend- however not to partake in aything pagan. Of course, in practice this is not done. Simply printed to appear reasonable and less cultish to the general public.
do you find that you've had to re-establish your familiarity with scriptures in other versions of the bible based on the translation errors in the nwt?
if so, which texts?
I was raised in it but never bapt. I left at 14 or 15...never having really read the Bible. So to me it wasn't so much getting to know a new Bible as much as learning what the Bible says without WT blinders...and learning things clearly stated by the Bible yet contrary to the WT. The turning point for my was really in 1995 when "this generation" was redefined. Prior to that I was a rebel but had some fear in the back of my mind- I thought it was an established truth that the end had to come b4 the 1914 generation completely disappeared. In reading that paragraph at the Sun WT study in 95 I thought to myself "the WT really is nothing"...Yrs later I realized the full import of this false prophecy.
