http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
adamah:
I'm wondering if this is yet another example of more willingness of journalists' willingness to doctor the evidence to downplay the effect of GCC....
No, it's just showing that the author of the article doesn't understand the difference between climate and weather.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
adamah:
DON'T look at the ice mass, as most viewers are going to do. Instead, take a point on the landmass (green, say the tip of the penisula) in the lower RIGHT corner of one of the pixs and take another point (say, one of the brown islands) in the lower right corner of the same pix, and measure the distance between these two points on your screen. Now, measure those same two fixed points on the other image, and compare their distances.
Comparing straight-line measurements of landmasses on different parts of the globe (or the same part of the world from a different perspective) receding away from the viewer does not give a reliable indication of scale, because the landmasses are on a curved surface. However, features nearer the center of the images (i.e. near the part of the 'globe' nearest the viewer) are the same size but with different rotation (about 6.8 degrees anticlockwise for Banks Island and Victoria Island in northern Canada). The zoom factor is the same for both images. As previously stated, the images have slightly different rotation, but the elements you labeled '1' and '3' are not applicable, and the different rotation is not enough to make the icemass 'appear' significantly larger.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
adamah:
it should be patently obvious that I was directing my comments to him, not you.
I kind of figured. But I didn't want it left unclear, particularly because mP has frequently tried to distort what I've said in the past.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
adamah:
Looks like you don't understand that climate change is NOT defined as the difference in weather over just "one year" (or a season, or even a day!), but over longer time-frames ("decades").
I hope you're saying that to mP and not me (though you introduced a quote by me??). I quite clearly told mP that his assertion about weather within the same year is not 'climate'.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
adamah:
Is anyone else bothered by the difference in zoom used between the two images, as if to overly dramatize the change?
There is no difference in the zoom at all. There is a slightly different rotation of the globe (but not actually a different center), however the changed aspect does not alter the relative size of the icemass.
i'm still determined not to vote - just to write something unpleasant about pollies on the ballot paper.
if i lived in victoria, i just may, as an act of sheer bastardry, vote for julian assange (of wikileaks fame), but i don't live in vic, so i cant.. my objection to voting is that the political choice offers two self-perpetuating oligarchies (who are something like the governing body).
they make up a slate of candidates and election advertising consists of attempting to persuade swinging voters to vote for their slate of candidates.. anyway, i noted that k.rudd has made a video in chinese, aimed apparently at mainland china.
mP:
It was a cheapo shot, because you have not once attempted to tell us why Afghans refugees decided to come after 2009 and not before. You are completely fixed on the SL problem which shows you have a bias of some sort. I asked the q and you cant answer, why dont you just reply and confirm you have no personal issues in this ?
Moron. I already told you that you deserve no 'explanation'. I don't have to justify myself to you, and if you want to believe I'm Sri Lankan, go ahead.
ok...so after this new light came out in the watchtower study over the weekend...a couple questions:.
1. why is the year 1914 still relevant to the doctrine?.
2. what would the effects be in they were to ever drop the 1914 teaching in the future (let's say 20 years from now)?.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
mP:
All i said in repsonse to Brinjen was she is feeling hotter only because her home is hotter due to tvs and more concerete thats all.
Brinjen, did he just call you fat?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
bohm:
For those that are interested on a more scientifically informed perspective
What? Even more informed than mP's 'fat people in the lounge' theory??
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
mP:
Dont put words in my mouth, i never said climate change is happening because of fat people. I said fat people feel the heat more than skinny people.
Also standing in front of a hot tv adds more temp to your room than the 1 degree of temp increase for the past 100ish years.
Climate change is measured by climate scientists using obvserational data, not by asking fat people what their lounge room feels like.
