Nah, you and your mates have just been in your echo chamber too long and forgotten how to logic
Posts by Jeffro
-
113
Try To Be Less White
by minimus inthat’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.
.
this is ridiculous!.
-
-
113
Try To Be Less White
by minimus inthat’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.
.
this is ridiculous!.
-
Jeffro
Have you had a brain injury? Stop claiming I said it definitely didn’t happen.
-
113
Try To Be Less White
by minimus inthat’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.
.
this is ridiculous!.
-
Jeffro
More nonsense. Still no evidence. Just more speculation. The only picture that has been provided shows that the course existed at the time within the LinkedIn Learning subscription (but since removed by the third-party provider). I probably won’t respond further on this thread if you just keep repeating the same false claims and personal attacks. -
30
The left is so retarded its offically lost its collective minds.
by mickbobcat inwhat a total bunch of asswipes the left has become.
now they have gotten the publishers to stop printing dr. seuss.
dr seuss.
-
Jeffro
What a load of nonsense. ‘Not mentioning an author’ is not a ‘statute’ in any way whatsoever.
-
113
Try To Be Less White
by minimus inthat’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.
.
this is ridiculous!.
-
Jeffro
Anony Mous:
once again, you claim they didn’t know the training was on there
No. That’s not what I said at all. I said there is no evidence.
-
224
Another problem for JW apologists
by Jeffro inthe 2013 edition of the new world translation renders 2 kings 17:1 as:.
in the 12th year of king ahaz of judah, hoshea the son of elah became king over israel in samaria; he ruled for nine years.. this is in fact a better rendering than the previous nwt, which stated:.
in the twelfth year of ahaz the king of judah, hoshea the son of elah became king in samaria over israel for nine years.. despite their improved rendering, the watch tower society still claims that hoshea's reign 'really' began in 758 bce, but that it was 'established' in the 12th year of ahaz.
-
Jeffro
scholar (22 December 2013):
I have my daughter and grandkids over Xmas but will respond to those posts that I have missed when they leave mid this week.
Still waiting... 🤣
-
30
The left is so retarded its offically lost its collective minds.
by mickbobcat inwhat a total bunch of asswipes the left has become.
now they have gotten the publishers to stop printing dr. seuss.
dr seuss.
-
Jeffro
Anony Mous:
The President of the United States, who is supposed to uphold the first amendment, is removing it by statute.
Where do you get this nonsense from? This claim is a complete lie.
-
30
The left is so retarded its offically lost its collective minds.
by mickbobcat inwhat a total bunch of asswipes the left has become.
now they have gotten the publishers to stop printing dr. seuss.
dr seuss.
-
Jeffro
minimus:
The listener, you can’t read them or buy them if the woke company decides to remove them from their circulation.
You make it sound like they're doing raids. A copyright owner has stopped publishing 6 books. Whether that's for good reasons, bad reasons, or no reason, that is up to them. But it doesn't mean resellers can't sell remaining stock or that they are 'being removed from circulation' or that people 'aren't allowed to read them'.
-
30
The left is so retarded its offically lost its collective minds.
by mickbobcat inwhat a total bunch of asswipes the left has become.
now they have gotten the publishers to stop printing dr. seuss.
dr seuss.
-
Jeffro
Anony Mous:
Amazon deleted the books from your Kindle if you already owned them. This is a digital book burning.
The Seuss titles in question are still on the Amazon Kindle store. Could be regional variations.
-
30
The left is so retarded its offically lost its collective minds.
by mickbobcat inwhat a total bunch of asswipes the left has become.
now they have gotten the publishers to stop printing dr. seuss.
dr seuss.
-
Jeffro
The claim that ‘you can’t ban a book if its copyright has expired’ is nonsensical. Various governments have banned books that either predate the concept of copyright or whose copyright has expired. However, the Seuss books in question in this thread haven’t actually been banned but are no longer published. A copyright owner discontinuing its own works is not a ‘ban’.