minimus:
They probably do? You’re a phony
That's the best you've got? My casual use of the word 'probably' is 'problematic' for you? But you're the one who keeps posting things - from Murdoch sources - that you're 'offended' about (which often includes misinformation). I'm just responding to the nonsense you've provided. Unlike you, I don't seek out this nonsense.
snare&racket:
If you feel offended by the feelings or speech or actions of someone with differing view to your own.... that is for you to deal with, not the other party.
Exactly. The people who complain that they're 'offended' are just as tedious as the tendentious responses to such nonsense. But that doesn't mean some commercial entity is intrinsically 'wrong' for rebranding something that is supposedly offensive if they figure they'll make more money by changing (though this often backfires). Some people seem to think that for-profit companies are providing a public service. 🤦♂️
It is particularly odd that some people suddenly become so attached to some cartoon character or product mascot when it is 'attacked' for being 'offensive' when they otherwise would have been completely ambivalent about it.