TonusOH:
I don't see a context in which the snake is good, at least as a counterbalance to god.
Indeed. It’s a particularly naive objection that if one is ‘bad’ in the story, then that must mean the other is ‘the good one’. Neither of them is ‘good’. It’s a co-opted story that has subsequently had its characters conflated with separate characterisations from other stories. Without the baggage of associating the god in the story with other notions about God, no one would consider either of them particularly nice.
I think the focus on "who lied first" is a distraction
To the extent that it’s just a story, that is true. But it is actually a key element when the baggage is stripped away. The story superimposes Yahweh, Adam and Eve into an adaptation of an older Babylonian story (and only later was Satan superimposed on the snake character). The god and the snake in the original story are more nuanced than just ‘good’ and ‘bad’.