i found out recently that michelangelo's painting of adam on the sistine chapel depicts him without a belly button.
i had never noticed this before and it makes sense that neither adam nor eve would have belly buttons, not having been born in the usual way.
then i realized all the first animals were created rather than born, according to the religious views of the origin of life.
Poor Sea Breeze simply ignores the work of actual biologists who have already established that cells could have developed from simpler forms that became more complex over time. Instead, the creationist, as usual, expects non-biologists to be experts in the field, while maintaining the contradictory belief that an infinitely complex deity just always existed. đ¤Śââď¸
The argument from ignorance is tedious and unsophisticated. Try something else.
i found out recently that michelangelo's painting of adam on the sistine chapel depicts him without a belly button.
i had never noticed this before and it makes sense that neither adam nor eve would have belly buttons, not having been born in the usual way.
then i realized all the first animals were created rather than born, according to the religious views of the origin of life.
How is your statement different than saying a Boeing 747 making a trans-atlantic flight never needed any engineering because there aren't any engineers on board?
đ¤Śââď¸
More argument from ignorance. I know you think you said something clever, but Boeings have never been observed to self-replicate. Because the premise of your tedious analogy assumes your conclusion, it is logically invalid.
Come back when you have evidence for an infinitely complex sky friend that just always existed. And then you can try to justify the inherent special pleading. đ¤Ł
i found out recently that michelangelo's painting of adam on the sistine chapel depicts him without a belly button.
i had never noticed this before and it makes sense that neither adam nor eve would have belly buttons, not having been born in the usual way.
then i realized all the first animals were created rather than born, according to the religious views of the origin of life.
See Breeze:
The non-Christian physicist Paul Davies
Fallacious appeal to authority (on top of the purported ploy that heâs ânon-Christianâ), since he isnât a biologist. Analogies about âinformationâ are not evidence of âdesignâ, and these chemical reactions in biological systems happen every second of every day without any need of magical sky friends. Systems become more complex over time rather than more simple so none of this is particularly compelling, and it remains a tedious argument from ignorance at its core.
fluoride action network.
http://www.fluoridealert.org.
fan bulletin 997: new video: vyvyan howard's toronto presentation.
Me earlier:
Unless fluoridation is the only thing that changed in the last 100 years, this doesnât math.
(This was a cheap shot for comic effect, and the original comment referred to modern society in general rather than only fluoridation. However, it didnât account for longer life expectancy and higher diagnosis rates also contributing to the increase in the number of deaths attributed to cancer rather than solely the ills of modern society. So it still doesnât math.)
fluoride action network.
http://www.fluoridealert.org.
fan bulletin 997: new video: vyvyan howard's toronto presentation.
The amount of fluoride in community based water fluoridation is typically well below the levels associated with fluoride levels in studies affecting childrenâs IQ. Factors such as excessive TikTok use (ideally, none) are probably impacting childrenâs IQ levels more than fluoridation might.
fluoride action network.
http://www.fluoridealert.org.
fan bulletin 997: new video: vyvyan howard's toronto presentation.
Witness 007:
100 years ago the Cancer rate was 1 in 100 today it's 1 in 3 people will get Cancer.....do the math,
Unless fluoridation is the only thing that changed in the last 100 years, this doesnât math. đ¤Ł
i found out recently that michelangelo's painting of adam on the sistine chapel depicts him without a belly button.
i had never noticed this before and it makes sense that neither adam nor eve would have belly buttons, not having been born in the usual way.
then i realized all the first animals were created rather than born, according to the religious views of the origin of life.
đ¤Śââď¸
i found out recently that michelangelo's painting of adam on the sistine chapel depicts him without a belly button.
i had never noticed this before and it makes sense that neither adam nor eve would have belly buttons, not having been born in the usual way.
then i realized all the first animals were created rather than born, according to the religious views of the origin of life.
jwundubbed:
Anyway the idea that Adam and Eve and all the animals were created rather than born, still makes me wonder why no one tries to use that as an argument for why the chicken came first... from A religious point of view.
Various creationists have posited that the fully formed chicken was made first. But the more astute (but not very) creationists are forced to acknowledge that chickens as we know them were domesticated from a different species, so they (the creationists, not the chickens) say a different bird of the same âkindâ (a nonsense term with no distinct meaning in taxonomy) was fully formed but the chicken egg came before the domesticated chicken.
i found out recently that michelangelo's painting of adam on the sistine chapel depicts him without a belly button.
i had never noticed this before and it makes sense that neither adam nor eve would have belly buttons, not having been born in the usual way.
then i realized all the first animals were created rather than born, according to the religious views of the origin of life.
ThomasMore:
VP Harris provides the philosophical answer: "So, when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time ...And there is such great significance to the passage of time when we think about a day in the life of our children."
Relevance to chicken and eggs: Zero. You posted irrelevant politically motivated nonsense.
Here is my take on where we are:
There are approx 334 million people in this great country.
Relevance to chickens and eggs: Zero. You explicitly made it a nationalist issue.
Now you have turned it into a Nationalist issue - a leap to be sure.
You brought up an irrelevant nationalist issue and now youâre complaining about being called out on it. You are not OK.
1. the continuity and visibility of the church.
the true church must be continuous from the apostolic age.
there is no room in christianity for a "gap" or interruption of thousands of years during which true christianity ceased to exist and then was revived in the form of another movement.
That generation was a moving target almost as soon as it was written.
Yes, but the choice of the expression suggests an original time of writing within a generation of Jesusâ purported ministry and written shortly after actual events presented as âprophecyâ that were supposed to be soon followed by the spurious supernatural events that never occurred. But the ambiguity of the âpropheticâ elements serves to âkeep the dream aliveâ because they can be applied to just about any period with enough squinting.
