is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
Vidqun:
I found it quite accurate, comparing well with the accounts in the Gospels.
🤦♂️ Hardly surprising that the later Christian forgery is consistent with the Christian ‘gospels’.
a confutation to an earlier pagan and anti-Christian work also known as the Acts of Pilate
And that makes you more confident about the later Christian forgery? Cognitive dissonance at its worst. And confirmation bias to boot.
is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
Vidqun:
Jeffro, not sure about your "fact" about the wrong emperor. In this version he wrote to Tiberius Caesar, which governed from 14 until 37 CE. That sounds about right.
Haha… I was waiting for that. The spurious work contains a separate letter to Caligula, who was not emperor during Pilate’s tenure. The letter to Tiberius was added later. But thanks for playing along.
is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
Nope. The Gospel of Nicodemus (containing the spurious Acta Pilate) is known to be a later apocryphal Christian work. And it has Pilate writing to the wrong emperor.
is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
Mikejw:
Our current dating system started from a man called Jesus Christ was born 2024 years ago. That is pretty strong evidence.
Our dating system (first adopted in the 6th century) is based on a tradition around someone who according to the source material would actually have been born in 4 BCE. Nothing about that establishes any 'supernatural' claims about Jesus, including the claim that he was 'Christ'. Our current names of four days of the week are based on Norse deities but it doesn't mean they're real.
also as has been said Josephus and many other ancient historians recorded Jesus.
A very small number of non-Christian sources (not "many") from the second century mentioned Jesus (or at least mentioned Christians), but did not confirm any claim that he was supernatural.
there is no doubt about this very special man called Jesus but there is doubt about the miracles and who he claimed to be?
All of the stories about Jesus' ministry in the gospels were written decades after his death, and it is impossible to know what if anything in the 'gospels' accurately represents anything Jesus actually said or did. We can reasonably conclude from Paul's writings that during Jesus' life or shortly after his death he was considered special by a small number of followers, and they convinced Paul (who never met Jesus) that Jesus provided a redemptive 'sacrifice', but nothing else can be reliably established.
is there any independently verified evidence that a miracle worker called jesus existed and did the things that the bible said he did?.
the four gospels were written by unknown authors many decades after the so called events, so can't be considered as eyewitness accounts.
i think that there may have been a apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the romans and the story evolved from their.
There is no contemporary evidence for the magical Jesus as presented in the 'gospels'. Paul's writings contain very little in the way of biographical details about Jesus and no specific details about his 'ministry'. Paul's own account of his 'conversion' also lacks detail, and the more detailed and contradictory versions in Acts were conveniently written after Paul's death (but are consistent with a temporal lobe seizure). Paul's conversion from opposer to Christian is also not remarkable, and similar conversions into various denominations are also seen today. There were any number of itinerant rabbis in the first century and just as many personality cults surrounding them, and it is entirely unremarkable that stories about one or more were compiled into the stories of the Jesus motif as presented in the 'gospels' decades later.
... is just three weeks from this saturday.
the org has been tight-lipped, really, successfully secret about advance info on these in recent years,.
now that these relatively recent changes on dress and grooming, reporting fs time, judicial matters, etc.
(The 'JW' in 'JW Holdings' actually stands for JungWoo.)
... is just three weeks from this saturday.
the org has been tight-lipped, really, successfully secret about advance info on these in recent years,.
now that these relatively recent changes on dress and grooming, reporting fs time, judicial matters, etc.
FreeTheMasons:
Last I knew, there were also JWs in Korea. And Ireland. And Switzerland. And many other places that own pieces of the companies listed in the JW Holding group.
Jehovah's Witnesses are in countries where there are things, therefore things in countries that mention the letters 'JW' must be Jehovah's Witnesses. And it's for reals because they have an unrelated company in Ireland.
🤦♂️
... is just three weeks from this saturday.
the org has been tight-lipped, really, successfully secret about advance info on these in recent years,.
now that these relatively recent changes on dress and grooming, reporting fs time, judicial matters, etc.
FreeTheMasons:
Wonder if they'll talk about their business
JW Holdings is a Korean based health care company not related to Jehovah’s Witnesses.
the hospital liaison committee (hlc) for jehovah’s witnesses does not pressure members to refuse blood transfusions.
rather, their role is to support jehovah’s witnesses in adhering to their pre-existing religious beliefs, which include a strict prohibition against accepting blood transfusions based on their interpretation of biblical scriptures.. jehovah’s witnesses are well-informed about their stance on blood from an early age, and refusing blood is a deeply ingrained religious conviction, not something imposed during a medical crisis.
the hlc’s purpose is to provide assistance in accessing bloodless treatment options, facilitating communication with healthcare providers, and helping ensure that the patient’s choices are respected.. while the hlc strongly supports adherence to the beliefs of jehovah’s witnesses, the ultimate decision remains with the individual.
usualusername1:
Will never use ChatGPT again!
That's a bit like saying you'll never use a phone again because you once dialed a wrong number. AI chatbots are only as good as the training data, which can contained biased information. The problem comes in not with ad hoc use of AI chatbots, but relying on non-trivial information without verifying it. This is the case for any information source, not just AI chatbots.
Nobody really cares if you don't use ChatGPT.
