Notice how the apologist refuses to engage with the material.
But the words must mean something and all that you have written is simply a rehash of GTR with pretty coloured charts.
My analysis of 586 or 587 is not addressed in GTR, and my other pages were compiled before I’d even heard of GTR. (And the words still “mean something” irrespective of your false claim about GTR, if you’re not so dumb that you can’t get past the ‘pretty colours’.) So you’re just further demonstrating that you’re a liar. You’re entirely intellectually dishonest, and you’re afraid to directly consider information that challenges your predetermined beliefs. But other readers can see your blustering and your refusal to consider information presented.