Jeffro

Joined

• started 46 topics
• posted 6,938 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Jeffro

• 
  272

  A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC

  by Londo111 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  this is the main series playlist:.

  http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.

  this is the accompanying video appendix:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  At least I have read for you have not. You simply reject any evidence or information that disagrees with your preconceived dogma. And you never cite any sources but simply rely on what others have told you to believe.

  Idiot. As I've told you many times, I've actually done my research based on source materials such as the Bible, Josephus and tablets held at the British Museum, and only then compared with other sources afterwards. And I'm still correct, as indicated by the agreement found with other sources. Occasionally, I've had to make minor corrections (though not on any major points) upon review of other sources, but as I have no vested interest in superstitious magical thinking, this has never mattered.

  Your childish taunts about what I may or may not have read are just stupid. And your claim is internally contradicted anyway.

  If you're not going to bother citing anything relevant, just go crawl back under your rock.

  You endlessly spout superstitious JW dogma, while claiming that everyone else is relying on what they've been "told to believe". It's so hypocritically sad that all I can do is laugh.
• 
  272

  A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC

  by Londo111 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  this is the main series playlist:.

  http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.

  this is the accompanying video appendix:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  Once again, he's said abolutely nothing relevant to the subject.

  Regardless of what material pseudo-scholar (allegedly) has read, he has stated outright on many occasions that he simply rejects any secular information that does not agree with his religion's preconcieved dogma. And he still hasn't cited any sources that agree with his nutty religion.
• 
  272

  A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC

  by Londo111 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  this is the main series playlist:.

  http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.

  this is the accompanying video appendix:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  So scholar has the best of the best and if required I could list... [blah blah blah]

  Irrelevant. It makes no difference what journals you possess. They don't support your nutty insane dogma.
• 
  272

  A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC

  by Londo111 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  this is the main series playlist:.

  http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.

  this is the accompanying video appendix:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  I hardly care what journals you have. They don't support your insane JW views. You were requested to cite the supposed journals that support your views.

  I challenge you provide information as what journals you have read in fact yyou probbably have not read a single journal in your life and no copies in your possession for all that you have is the arguments borrowed from Carl Jonsson.

  Idiot.
• 
  272

  A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC

  by Londo111 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  this is the main series playlist:.

  http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.

  this is the accompanying video appendix:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  Idiot.

  pseudo-scholar claims he has provided 'scholarly literature', but isn't game to actually cite any. On the rare occasion that he has obliquely referred to a secular source, it hasn't actually supported JW dogma anyway.

  But at least in one area you agree with WT chronology in the total regnal years for the Divided Monarchy approximating 390 years for this is well shown in your early tabulations for the period of Israelite history. Further, Rodger Young unlike most other chronologists also agrees with such findimgs so we are all together on the same page.

  No, idiot. The Watch Tower Society is only in agreement for that duration because it copied other sources. However, it still assigns the wrong years.
• 
  73

  DID YOU KNOW the latest Brooklyn sell-offs will take total Watchtower earnings to $804 MILLION since 2004?

  by cedars in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  hi folks.

  i apologize if this is old news to some, but it's news to me.. i stumbled on a comprehensive list of all the sold properties on wikipedia on this link... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/watch_tower_bible_and_tract_society_of_pennsylvania#brooklyn_property_sales.

  it's just a mind-boggling amount of money, and useful information to have handy when talking to witness relatives.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  Eldenno:

  Ofcourse i can... here a list for the last 10 yrs

  The list you provided is a distorted subset of releases to make it appear more things were produced in 2013.

  Many of the things listed for 2013 are mundane items that have in fact been printed in each of the years listed. Several are not printed items at all.

  The source of your list is a third-party website, which seems to be merely an extract of bootlegged publications.
• 
  57

  Casual sexism in Watchtower literature

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i notice the sexist language of the watchtower a lot more these days.

  is it on the increase or am i simply more tuned into to noticing it now?

  for example this statement in the june kingdom ministry:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  St George of England:

  *** w52 4/15 pp. 254-255 Questions From Readers ***
  Is it proper for men to tip their hats to women?—G. S., Missouri.
  This is a rant about hat tipping and not standing for a woman.

  Ah... what a 'wonderful' article. Such resplendant advice.

  *** w52 4/15 p. 255 Questions From Readers ***

  Many customs are harmless, but when they contradict a theocratic principle Satan is behind it to discredit God.

  What custom does exist whereby women show respect to men? The absence of any is not just by chance, but is by satanic design to untheocratically elevate the woman above the man. In many ways Satan has taken the woman from the position assigned her by God, taken her from the home and its duties and put her into politics and commerce and religious leadership, and thereby caused much of the modern breakdown on the family front.

  O... K...

  Superstitious paranoid idiots.
• 
  272

  A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC

  by Londo111 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  this is the main series playlist:.

  http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.

  this is the accompanying video appendix:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  Comatose:

  Scholar is Lars!!! I'm certain.

  No, they have different pathologies. And they're in different countries.
• 
  272

  A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC

  by Londo111 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  this is the main series playlist:.

  http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.

  this is the accompanying video appendix:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  Jeffro I too over many years have posted on this forum pages and pages

  Yes, but you are wrong. You simply ignore the many, many times your arguments have been completely trounced with detailed, sourced information. You respond with vague nonsense and refuse to provide sources to back up your weak claims. Just go away.
• 
  272

  A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC

  by Londo111 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  this is the main series playlist:.

  http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plynx0om_bmgbfmnapjr_v5fe9_pf8sqa1.

  this is the accompanying video appendix:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  typical of those who nothing to say

  LOL. I (and others) have pages and pages on this forum showing your drivel to be pathetic. And Londo has put up several videos that readily show you to be in error. In addition, I have several other pages of information showing the many flaws in other attempts to defend your ridiculous superstitions. I am hardly "those who nothing to say". Idiot.

  As always, readers are welcome to ask any questions on the topic.