Yep, downvote the presentation of evidence including links and screenshots if it doesn’t fit the narrative. 😂
Sums up these guys’ level of respect for facts pretty well.
that’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.
.
this is ridiculous!.
Yep, downvote the presentation of evidence including links and screenshots if it doesn’t fit the narrative. 😂
Sums up these guys’ level of respect for facts pretty well.
that’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.
.
this is ridiculous!.
Orwell’s books are also still on the Kindle store.
What was previously removed were copies of the books provided by an unlicensed publisher.
that’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.
.
this is ridiculous!.
Another screed of text without the claimed evidentiary screenshots. Instead you fall back to ‘well some employees said so’. Because disgruntled employees never make things up or exaggerate. 😂 (Also, eyewitness testimony is one of the weakest forms of evidence.) So... no actual evidence then. But you said there were pictures and screenshots proving it. Was that a lie?
Oh no, they won’t ‘mention dr Seuss’ at a specific event. How dare they (though that decision actually predates Biden’s presidency). Totally sounds like the same thing as a ban. 🤦♂️ Read Across America indicated in 2017 that it planned to phase out mentioning Dr Seuss. https://www.slj.com/?detailStory=cat-hat-racist-read-across-america-shifts-away-dr-seuss-toward-diverse-books
that’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.
.
this is ridiculous!.
Only screenshot I’ve seen is one showing that the course was available to Coca-Cola staff from the company’s LinkedIn Learning subscription. But by all means, provide screenshots showing that the course was mandatory. I’ve explicitly asked several times on this thread for evidence of something like an email listing the training as mandatory, but you just keep saying, “oh there’s evidence” without providing any.
Your threshold for what constitutes ‘evidence’ is a bit thin though. On another thread you claim that not mentioning an author constitutes a ‘’statute’ to ban their books. You also claimed Amazon deleted specific books from Kindle devices though I provided a screenshot showing they are still available on the Kindle store (at least to Australian customers).
that’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.
.
this is ridiculous!.
Nah, you and your mates have just been in your echo chamber too long and forgotten how to logic
that’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.
.
this is ridiculous!.
Have you had a brain injury? Stop claiming I said it definitely didn’t happen.
that’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.
.
this is ridiculous!.
what a total bunch of asswipes the left has become.
now they have gotten the publishers to stop printing dr. seuss.
dr seuss.
What a load of nonsense. ‘Not mentioning an author’ is not a ‘statute’ in any way whatsoever.
that’s what coca-cola is telling their employees.
.
this is ridiculous!.
Anony Mous:
once again, you claim they didn’t know the training was on there
No. That’s not what I said at all. I said there is no evidence.
the 2013 edition of the new world translation renders 2 kings 17:1 as:.
in the 12th year of king ahaz of judah, hoshea the son of elah became king over israel in samaria; he ruled for nine years.. this is in fact a better rendering than the previous nwt, which stated:.
in the twelfth year of ahaz the king of judah, hoshea the son of elah became king in samaria over israel for nine years.. despite their improved rendering, the watch tower society still claims that hoshea's reign 'really' began in 758 bce, but that it was 'established' in the 12th year of ahaz.
scholar (22 December 2013):
I have my daughter and grandkids over Xmas but will respond to those posts that I have missed when they leave mid this week.
Still waiting... 🤣