minimus:
Companies will always look for the bottom line how much money are they going to make or not make.
Obviously. And?
does using uncle ben’s food products offend you?.
are you offended if you see a flag?
what about a confederate flag?.
minimus:
Companies will always look for the bottom line how much money are they going to make or not make.
Obviously. And?
does using uncle ben’s food products offend you?.
are you offended if you see a flag?
what about a confederate flag?.
does using uncle ben’s food products offend you?.
are you offended if you see a flag?
what about a confederate flag?.
punkofnice:
More reason to take things with a pinch of salt. It's all just media pantomime. We're being played it would seem.
It is very frequently the Murdoch press that promotes these divisive nothings, very often first appearing in its tabloids such as The New York Post, The Sun etc and then recirculated in its other papers and news outlets to pass it off as ‘news’ to pad out a lack of actual content.
does using uncle ben’s food products offend you?.
are you offended if you see a flag?
what about a confederate flag?.
Aunt Jemima offends you?? Get a life and stop getting offended over nothing.
Sure. But if the company that makes it decides they can make more money by changing the brand, good for them. The people complaining about the rebranding generally aren’t really soooo attached to the Aunt Jemima character that it really affects them. If people are that attached to a fictional character on a cake mix, they should probably get that checked.
does using uncle ben’s food products offend you?.
are you offended if you see a flag?
what about a confederate flag?.
Punkofnice:
When a person starts finding a reason to be offended by the gender of a plastic potato or a brand name, then they need medication not adulation.
In the good old days, they'd have been sectioned not trending on Twitter (the cesspit safe space for attention seeking nobodies).
Indeed. It’s best to just ignore this nonsense rather than giving it airtime. (Though in the case of PotatoHead, Hasbro rebranded the brand name to introduce additional characters but retained the Mr and Mrs PotatoHead characters so there is also some misinformation involved here.)
Are some companies jumping on the ‘woke’ bandwagon? Sure. Does it actually affect the people complaining about it? No.
taking a close look at the operation of the jws religion you can observe technics of brainwashing orchestrated through the literature the wts publishes for its members such as the watchtower .. everything these men have done had calculating agendas, which were to firstly attract attention to the literature they published, to cultivate power toward themselves, to intentionally take control over people's lives and of course draw in money.. brainwashing (also known as mind control, menticide, coercive persuasion, thought control, thought reform, and re-education) is the concept that the human mind can be altered or controlled by certain psychological techniques.
brainwashing is said to reduce its subjects' ability to think critically or independently,[1] to allow the introduction of new, unwanted thoughts and ideas into their minds,[2] as well as to change their attitudes, values and beliefs.
does using uncle ben’s food products offend you?.
are you offended if you see a flag?
what about a confederate flag?.
minimus:
Do You Get Easily Offended By What People Do or Don’t Do?
Also minimus:
I am soo sick of the “ woke “ generation. Just go awayyyyy.
Oh the irony. Sounds like you want everyone to just do the ‘reasonable’ thing and like all the things you like. 😂
Other than choosing to be riled up by a mixture of real and imagined ‘woke’ complaints found in the media, very little of what the ‘woke’ crowd says or does actually affects you in any way.
can a person resign from being one of jehovah’s witnesses?.
frequently asked questions.
a person can resign from our organization in two ways:.
these cartoons have been labeled by the venerable new york times newspaper as offensive.
they offend mexicans and pepe is a womanizing french skunk too handsy enabling the “rape culture “.
this stuff is getting so ridiculous it isn’t funny.
Oh, a personal attack. What a surprise. But try to be cleverer please.
Funny how attacking a cartoon character is a global tragedy but attacking actual people is fine. 🤦♂️
these cartoons have been labeled by the venerable new york times newspaper as offensive.
they offend mexicans and pepe is a womanizing french skunk too handsy enabling the “rape culture “.
this stuff is getting so ridiculous it isn’t funny.
minimus:
Jeffro sees no real evidence of anything really happening here. It’s just “nonsense” .
There you go manufacturing my position again. But I actually said that both sides are trivial divisive nonsense. Obviously this includes the assessment of harmless tropes as ‘offensive’. A cartoon from the 1950s, that you otherwise rarely think about, falling out of popularity in itself is indeed trivial. It is the divisive nonsense itself that is harmful.
It is telling that a single paywalled opinion piece in one newspaper is trumpeted worldwide by the Murdoch press though.