Hahaha 🤣 JW chronology is well and truly refuted. I provide information for people who have been subject to JW propaganda whose access to other information is often limited. In the broader community, JW chronology is an irrelevance and is not considered remotely plausible by any independent historian or scholar.
Posts by Jeffro
-
178Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 ini hope this is in the right area.
i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.
for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
-
-
-
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 ini hope this is in the right area.
i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.
for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
-
-
Jeffro
scholar:Well, cancer and its cure are both objects of research providing a cure and other benefits as with Bible Chronology whatever its source
In your analogy, people who endorse JW chronology are more like anti-vaxxers.
Accepting JW chronology in the face of evidence to the contrary is not only detrimental in itself but also increases propensity for accepting other irrational ideas.
-
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 ini hope this is in the right area.
i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.
for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
-
-
Jeffro
scholar:
benefits such as faith in Bible Prophecy etc.
🤦♂️No, especially in the case of JW beliefs, that's the disease, not the cure.
-
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 ini hope this is in the right area.
i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.
for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
-
-
Jeffro
scholar:You are obsessed with WT Chronology as shown by your website so such obsession proves that our Chronology has substance as your pretty chart demonstrates.
That's a bit like saying cancer is good because people research cancer.
-
7
Schizophreniform!
by Atlantis inschizophreniform.
like schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder is a type of "psychosis" in which a person cannot tell what is real from what is imagined.
it also affects how people think, act, express emotions, and relate to others.. .
-
-
Jeffro
Compliance with a set of delusional religious beliefs and practices should not be so quickly conflated with a specific psychiatric diagnosis.
(And no, I didn't downvote the post.)
-
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 ini hope this is in the right area.
i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.
for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
-
-
Jeffro
scholar:
No. it is a Chronology with just as much validity as any others-
🤣 Sure, that's why it's so highly regarded by actual historians, who regularly cite and endorse Watch Tower Society chronology. That's sarcasm by the way. 🙄
worthy of criticism
It sure is.
and careful which is what you are obsessed with namely WT Chronology. Your obsession with the subject demonstrates its validity, does it not?
Hahaha no, you dolt. I point out the errors in a straightforward manner to make it clear to other readers just how wrong JW chronology is, for the benefit of those questioning JW beliefs or in danger of getting roped in to the denomination.
-
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 ini hope this is in the right area.
i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.
for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
-
-
Jeffro
scholar:
Your claim not to have read COJ prior to 2015 is incredulous but whatever the case you must have come across information that was derived from COJ's research. Your timeline certainly shows the validity of JW Chronology and the fact that it is inconsistent with others is simply opinion which is common to scholarship where experts seldom agree.
You can't even understand the concept of 'many towns were destroyed and some weren't' so I wouldn't expect you to understand that two different people can independently arrive at the correct result.
Since I've put together timelines presenting both the correct chronology and the JW chronology, I anticipate further confusion on your part given your propensity for garbling context.
-
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 ini hope this is in the right area.
i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.
for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
-
-
Jeffro
scholar:
What your pretty chart on WT/JW chronology shows that our Chronology has a certain validity and that difference in comparison to other schemes only differs by a few years or at least 20 Years. Your chart is well constructed and I will make good use of it in my defence of our wondrous Bible Chronology. Thank You!!
"a few years or at least 20 Years" 🤣
The timeline actually demonstrates that WT chronology has no validity and is out by 20 years (extending to 68 years by Solomon's time) for purely dishonest reasons.
Every time you try to 'defend' nonsensical WT chronology, you just come off looking dishonest and stupid. Good luck with that.
-
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 ini hope this is in the right area.
i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.
for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
-
-
Jeffro
scholar:
For the reason that you have been influenced by COJ and your timeline does not accord with WT chronology.
I did get around to reading COJ's book around 2015, many years after I had established the timeline for the period. The fact that my timeline shows WT chronology to be erroneous is largely the point, and the fact that it is consistent with secular historians and other honest individuals is only because it is correct.
-
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 ini hope this is in the right area.
i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.
for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
-
-
Jeffro
'scholar':
You introduced Stern so if there is a contradiction in his statements then that is not my problem.
There is no contradiction in Stern's statements. Most of the towns were destroyed, and the towns that were destroyed were not resettled throughout the exilic period. Some other towns were not destroyed and remained populated. If you imagine the statements to be contradictory, you quite definitely have a problem.
You need to focus on the fact that the judgement of Babylon only occurred after 70 years was fulfilled and that was not at its Fall in 539 BCE any other interpretation is fanciful. Also, the verse clearly indicated that the land of Babylon would also be desolated which did not happen in with the Fall.
Complete nonsense. The claim that Babylon was 'called to account' in some manner in 537 BCE is plainly stupid, and the land of Babylon wasn't desolated in 537 either, further invalidating your claim. Daniel 5:26-31 (written later but consistent with how the Jews regarded the period) quite clearly refers to the end of Babylon's days and being called to account when it was conquered in 539.