i have seen arguments surrounding jesus' resurrection being proof of "the trinity" - now while in some cases it's a good argument the evidence for it remains very weak.
(bible quotes are from the nwt but other bibles are referenced, use whichever you please) this following version of it is a good example.. "the bible indicates that all [persons] of the trinity was involved in jesus’ resurrection.
galatians[1:1] says that the father raised jesus from the dead.
None of it supports Sea Breeze’s claims about souls. None of it rules out entirely physical processes that aren’t well understood. None of it rules out any other potential real or imagined alternative to ‘souls’. None of it provides any indication of what a ‘soul’ is or any mechanism for how it would interact with the body.
It’s all a pitiful argument from ignorance no different to thinking lightning must be from the gods. As such, it is basically the ‘god of the gaps’ argument.
i have seen arguments surrounding jesus' resurrection being proof of "the trinity" - now while in some cases it's a good argument the evidence for it remains very weak.
(bible quotes are from the nwt but other bibles are referenced, use whichever you please) this following version of it is a good example.. "the bible indicates that all [persons] of the trinity was involved in jesus’ resurrection.
galatians[1:1] says that the father raised jesus from the dead.
Sea Breeze:
No circles. I've been on point consistently. Why is it so hard for you to just admit that these facts just don't fit in a materialist naturalistic paradigmn?
Why would I ‘admit’ any such thing? I have a basic knowledge of neurotransmitters and brain function at a layman level. I have no training in neurology. Why would I presume that just because I do not have an explanation for some medical conditions (though your examples are anecdotal) that it must mean it is unexplainable in the absence of supernatural fantasies?! Your perspective is bizarre.
You are yet to provide any demonstration of the existence of souls, any mechanism for how they interact with the body, or how you ruled out any other potential (natural or supernatural) explanations.
occult un forces seek to hijack religion for globalism.
https://thenewamerican.com/occult-un-forces-seek-to-hijack-religion-for-globalism/it does not look like religions dominate un but the other way around.
journalist alex newman gives a totally different picture about the real state of affairs.
🤦♂️
i have seen arguments surrounding jesus' resurrection being proof of "the trinity" - now while in some cases it's a good argument the evidence for it remains very weak.
(bible quotes are from the nwt but other bibles are referenced, use whichever you please) this following version of it is a good example.. "the bible indicates that all [persons] of the trinity was involved in jesus’ resurrection.
galatians[1:1] says that the father raised jesus from the dead.
You’re going in circles with the same tedious false dichotomy, ignoring any other (real or imagined) explanation that don’t fit your superstitions. The simple fact is that you don’t actually have the explanation for, nor any way of verifying, the stories either. Just go away.
i have seen arguments surrounding jesus' resurrection being proof of "the trinity" - now while in some cases it's a good argument the evidence for it remains very weak.
(bible quotes are from the nwt but other bibles are referenced, use whichever you please) this following version of it is a good example.. "the bible indicates that all [persons] of the trinity was involved in jesus’ resurrection.
galatians[1:1] says that the father raised jesus from the dead.
Sea Breeze:
Isn't that the same as saying, "I don't know" and then proceeding to try and construct an argument from this admitted ignorance using mere proclamations?
You’re the only one ‘proclaiming’ an entirely unverifiable ‘explanation’. And you still haven’t explained how you ruled out other ‘explanations’.
I probably won’t bother responding to your nonsense further.
i have seen arguments surrounding jesus' resurrection being proof of "the trinity" - now while in some cases it's a good argument the evidence for it remains very weak.
(bible quotes are from the nwt but other bibles are referenced, use whichever you please) this following version of it is a good example.. "the bible indicates that all [persons] of the trinity was involved in jesus’ resurrection.
galatians[1:1] says that the father raised jesus from the dead.
Sea Breeze:
My worldview accomodates this data quite comfortably.
It is not remotely surprising that a belief based on stories that were originally made up by primitive people specifically to try to explain things they couldn’t understand ‘accommodates’ your attempt to explain something that is not understood. 🤦♂️
But it isn’t an explanation, just a superstition that you can’t define or prove. When any medical mysteries have finally been understood, the answer has never once been ‘souls’.
i have seen arguments surrounding jesus' resurrection being proof of "the trinity" - now while in some cases it's a good argument the evidence for it remains very weak.
(bible quotes are from the nwt but other bibles are referenced, use whichever you please) this following version of it is a good example.. "the bible indicates that all [persons] of the trinity was involved in jesus’ resurrection.
galatians[1:1] says that the father raised jesus from the dead.
I’m not playing your tedious game. I have no way of testing or verifying the claims made. I do not have, nor do I require, an explanation for these stories. Nor is any specific explanation required in order for your superstitions to be unfounded.
i have seen arguments surrounding jesus' resurrection being proof of "the trinity" - now while in some cases it's a good argument the evidence for it remains very weak.
(bible quotes are from the nwt but other bibles are referenced, use whichever you please) this following version of it is a good example.. "the bible indicates that all [persons] of the trinity was involved in jesus’ resurrection.
galatians[1:1] says that the father raised jesus from the dead.
🤦♂️
Because, naturally, only your chosen superstition can be offered as an ‘explanation’, despite the fact that your ‘facts’, even if legitimate reports, are unexplained rather than evidence of souls (or time travelling aliens, or curses, or whatever woo any particular person subscribes to).
i have seen arguments surrounding jesus' resurrection being proof of "the trinity" - now while in some cases it's a good argument the evidence for it remains very weak.
(bible quotes are from the nwt but other bibles are referenced, use whichever you please) this following version of it is a good example.. "the bible indicates that all [persons] of the trinity was involved in jesus’ resurrection.
galatians[1:1] says that the father raised jesus from the dead.
See Breeze:
Do you really believe that if I ask you if you are an atheist, that amounts to an ad hominem attack?
C'mon Jeffro. Get off your high horse. That is a crazy thing to say.
Straw man. I didn’t say it was an ‘attack’. But it is irrelevant ad hominem.
You are yet to provide any evidence of souls, or any mechanism that would explain how they interact with bodies, or how you ruled out any other explanation.
i have seen arguments surrounding jesus' resurrection being proof of "the trinity" - now while in some cases it's a good argument the evidence for it remains very weak.
(bible quotes are from the nwt but other bibles are referenced, use whichever you please) this following version of it is a good example.. "the bible indicates that all [persons] of the trinity was involved in jesus’ resurrection.
galatians[1:1] says that the father raised jesus from the dead.
Also, your ‘facts’ are unverifiable anecdotes.
