See how the apologist just becomes more and more demanding no matter what is provided. But if you dare to ask for evidence that the Bible is ‘inspired’, he calls you deluded. 😂 🤦♂️
Because the apologist worships the Watch Tower Society, there ‘must’ be something ‘wrong’ with the solstice dates returned by the astronomy program or the date given for the solstice in the astronomical diary. 🤦♂️ Therefore no amount of evidence will satisfy the apologist. Anything that disagrees with his precious Watch Tower Society conclusions will be tediously scrutinised ad infinitum, but the same degree of skepticism is not applied to his own position.
And in addition to rejecting the rock solid dates for the solstices in both years, the apologist also now demands that I rehash the details for the lunar eclipses. 🤦♂️ However, others have previously shown that the Watch Tower Society’s claims that the lunar observations are ‘wrong’ for 568 BCE are entirely dishonest. The demanding apologist can do some work for himself for once and search for that existing information.