They get nitpicky, like Jeffro, over the wrong points.
You can’t help yourself can you. These snide little judgements of people who point out any little thing you get wrong. Please stick to good content and just say those nonsense parts to yourself.
this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?
god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.
in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.
They get nitpicky, like Jeffro, over the wrong points.
You can’t help yourself can you. These snide little judgements of people who point out any little thing you get wrong. Please stick to good content and just say those nonsense parts to yourself.
this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?
god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.
in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.
🙄 And you were doing so well....Or that you give credit to.
this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?
god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.
in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.
The claim that the practice of including ‘narratives’ in modern law books was adopted from the Mosaic Law (itself derived from Babylonian law and other early influences) is a simplification. Western legal systems have been developed through various influences, particularly Roman law and English common law. Stating the facts of specific cases in law books is more strongly tied to English common law rather than a direct or intentional adoption of Jewish tradition. The cases establishing case law refer to actual events rather than cautionary fictional tales. Also, the presence of the Ten Commandments in courtrooms or on state land is a reflection of cultural heritage rather than legal foundation. It is a frequent lie, especially in the US, that Western laws are ‘based on the Ten Commandments’. More than half of the Ten Commandments are not laws in the US, and the establishment clause of the US Constitution prohibits the first 4.
this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?
god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.
in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.
KalebOutWest:
This is an example of "The Mandela Effect,"
Not really. The Mandela Effect refers to details that are widely misremembered, not simply a widespread incorrect belief that a mythical story is historical. (MMM didn’t say that God told them it was wrong, but only that it would be pointless to do so if they didn’t understand that anyway, so that wasn’t an example of the Mandela Effect in the scope of the narrative either. It’s just speculation about details that are not provided.)
Of course the rest of the point still holds aside from the semantics though.
this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?
god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.
in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.
nicolaou:
Don't waste your time Jeffro. God's lies are the theme of this topic so obfuscation is the least we can expect from his followers.
Oh I know. But he’s the foil, not the audience.
this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?
god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.
in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.
🤦♂️
this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?
god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.
in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.
What a load of nonsense. The chemistry is already understood (and if it weren’t, your position would still just be an argument from ignorance anyway). There’s no need for a sky wizard. And metabolism of cells has nothing to do with a ‘truer self’ (whatever that means). 🙄
Only theists claim that life arises from ‘scattered dust’.
Still no meaningful definition provided.
this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?
god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.
in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.
Halcon:
Hehe, you have a way of verifying if spirit matches up with my definition?
Well I said it’s unverifiable so obviously not. 🤦♂️ If your comprehension skills are this poor, it’s obvious why you got so many of the details wrong about the ‘Adam and Eve’ story. There’s no evidence for a deity and your prattle about a ‘truer self’ is esoteric drivel that doesn’t even relate to your first attempt at a definition. In reality ‘spirit’ is a superstitious placeholder for whatever nonsense the ‘believer’ feels like it is at the time.
this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?
god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.
in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.
Halcon:
Spirit is your truer self from the perspective of God.
That’s just unverifiable word salad.
those of us who have deep roots into watchtower remember the shadowy whispers about "the evil slave" when we were kids.. for those that need to get up to speed: .
the internal crisis came to its full with the occurrence of an outstanding bible-predicted event, namely, the coming of jehovah’s “messenger,” christ jesus, to jehovah’s temple for judgment in the spring of 1918, to separate the “faithful and discreet slave” class from the “evil slave” group.
(mal.
The ‘evil slave’ is a motif in a parable. So because it isn’t actually a thing that exists, it would be accurate to say it hasn’t died out.