Jeffro

Joined

• started 46 topics
• posted 6,784 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Jeffro

• 
  37

  The evidence that fluoride lowers IQ is stronger than what was thought

  by What-A-Coincidence in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  fluoride action network.

  http://www.fluoridealert.org.

  fan bulletin 997: new video: vyvyan howard's toronto presentation.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  Witness 007:

  100 years ago the Cancer rate was 1 in 100 today it's 1 in 3 people will get Cancer.....do the math,

  Unless fluoridation is the only thing that changed in the last 100 years, this doesn’t math. 🤣
• 
  36

  Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

  by jwundubbed in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i found out recently that michelangelo's painting of adam on the sistine chapel depicts him without a belly button.

  i had never noticed this before and it makes sense that neither adam nor eve would have belly buttons, not having been born in the usual way.

  then i realized all the first animals were created rather than born, according to the religious views of the origin of life.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  🤦‍♂️
• 
  36

  Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

  by jwundubbed in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i found out recently that michelangelo's painting of adam on the sistine chapel depicts him without a belly button.

  i had never noticed this before and it makes sense that neither adam nor eve would have belly buttons, not having been born in the usual way.

  then i realized all the first animals were created rather than born, according to the religious views of the origin of life.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  jwundubbed:

  Anyway the idea that Adam and Eve and all the animals were created rather than born, still makes me wonder why no one tries to use that as an argument for why the chicken came first... from A religious point of view.

  Various creationists have posited that the fully formed chicken was made first. But the more astute (but not very) creationists are forced to acknowledge that chickens as we know them were domesticated from a different species, so they (the creationists, not the chickens) say a different bird of the same ‘kind’ (a nonsense term with no distinct meaning in taxonomy) was fully formed but the chicken egg came before the domesticated chicken.
• 
  36

  Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

  by jwundubbed in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i found out recently that michelangelo's painting of adam on the sistine chapel depicts him without a belly button.

  i had never noticed this before and it makes sense that neither adam nor eve would have belly buttons, not having been born in the usual way.

  then i realized all the first animals were created rather than born, according to the religious views of the origin of life.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ThomasMore:

  VP Harris provides the philosophical answer: "So, when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time ...And there is such great significance to the passage of time when we think about a day in the life of our children."

  Relevance to chicken and eggs: Zero. You posted irrelevant politically motivated nonsense.

  Here is my take on where we are:
  There are approx 334 million people in this great country.

  Relevance to chickens and eggs: Zero. You explicitly made it a nationalist issue.

  Now you have turned it into a Nationalist issue - a leap to be sure.

  You brought up an irrelevant nationalist issue and now you’re complaining about being called out on it. You are not OK.
• 
  60

  The Question of the "Great Apostasy" and the Historical Continuity of Christianity

  by aqwsed12345 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  1. the continuity and visibility of the church.

  the true church must be continuous from the apostolic age.

  there is no room in christianity for a "gap" or interruption of thousands of years during which true christianity ceased to exist and then was revived in the form of another movement.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  That generation was a moving target almost as soon as it was written.

  Yes, but the choice of the expression suggests an original time of writing within a generation of Jesus’ purported ministry and written shortly after actual events presented as ‘prophecy’ that were supposed to be soon followed by the spurious supernatural events that never occurred. But the ambiguity of the ‘prophetic’ elements serves to ‘keep the dream alive’ because they can be applied to just about any period with enough squinting.
• 
  36

  Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

  by jwundubbed in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i found out recently that michelangelo's painting of adam on the sistine chapel depicts him without a belly button.

  i had never noticed this before and it makes sense that neither adam nor eve would have belly buttons, not having been born in the usual way.

  then i realized all the first animals were created rather than born, according to the religious views of the origin of life.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ThomasMore:

  Jeffro - It was intended to be prattle so I am glad you got it, it seems that you took it personal.

  What possible reason would I have for taking it personal(ly)? Biased media took a cheap shot at a politician in a foreign country, and you followed suit. It’s nothing new and not remotely interesting. (I do hope you realise the US is not actually the centre of the universe).
• 
  60

  The Question of the "Great Apostasy" and the Historical Continuity of Christianity

  by aqwsed12345 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  1. the continuity and visibility of the church.

  the true church must be continuous from the apostolic age.

  there is no room in christianity for a "gap" or interruption of thousands of years during which true christianity ceased to exist and then was revived in the form of another movement.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  However, this position contradicts the teachings of the Catholic Church, which holds that the sanctity of the Church does not depend on the moral state of its members.

  No conflict of interest there. 🤣

  However, these sins do not justify the broad generalization that every priest or the entire Church is guilty.

  Oh goody, a straw man.🤦‍♂️

  Can’t be bothered going through everything in that (yet another) rambling post. I guess ‘all Catholics’ must have a problem with being concise. 😒
• 
  60

  The Question of the "Great Apostasy" and the Historical Continuity of Christianity

  by aqwsed12345 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  1. the continuity and visibility of the church.

  the true church must be continuous from the apostolic age.

  there is no room in christianity for a "gap" or interruption of thousands of years during which true christianity ceased to exist and then was revived in the form of another movement.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  peacefulpete:

  Again, the parallels of the events surrounding Bar Kokhba and Judas Maccabeus, are pretty hard to miss.

  It is an interesting idea, and it is ‘possible’ (highly likely) that edits were made to the documents after their original form. But it’s also very easy to see ‘obvious parallels’ after later events have occurred (and it’s what JWs and other groups do for their own ‘obvious’ interpretations about ‘our day’). Of course, unlike the JW nonsense, it’s not entirely implausible that references to events up to the 130s may have been edited in, but that much later is not consistent with the narrative that everything was expected to occur ‘within a generation’.
  
• 
  60

  The Question of the "Great Apostasy" and the Historical Continuity of Christianity

  by aqwsed12345 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  1. the continuity and visibility of the church.

  the true church must be continuous from the apostolic age.

  there is no room in christianity for a "gap" or interruption of thousands of years during which true christianity ceased to exist and then was revived in the form of another movement.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  The essence of the red herring fallacy

  Ironically, the entire longwinded passage was a red herring. Quite independent of the fact that there are legitimate criticisms of Catholicism in particular, like all brands of Christianity, Catholicism relies on superstition, unreliable traditions and unverifiable claims.
• 
  60

  The Question of the "Great Apostasy" and the Historical Continuity of Christianity

  by aqwsed12345 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  1. the continuity and visibility of the church.

  the true church must be continuous from the apostolic age.

  there is no room in christianity for a "gap" or interruption of thousands of years during which true christianity ceased to exist and then was revived in the form of another movement.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  peacefulpete:

  My research has led me to the opinion that Mark in it's final form could be that late. The min-apocalypse shows signs of being reworked/updated to include events of the 3rd war. Matt followed soon, Luke a decade or so later.

  I’m not saying it’s impossible, but it is unnecessary and not entirely likely. Picking an event that seems similar about ‘false prophets’ and concluding that it ‘must’ be part of the ‘fulfilment’ (irrespective of whether it is asserted as ‘prophecy’) is falling into the same trap as people who say there are ‘false prophets’ fulfilling it now. In the same manner, if Mark were written when most scholars say it was, people in the 130s could have run around saying , “See, Mark has prophecy about what’s happening now,” but really it’s just more events that are ‘similar enough’ to some vague statements. Then through the years, there are more and more events that ‘fit’ (due to ambiguity), and you get to where we are now.