it-1 p. 493 communication - "when the circumcision issue was resolved by the governing body in jerusalem......".
it-1 p. 881 galatians, letter to the - "by reason of a revelation, paul, with barnabas and titus, went to jerusalem regarding the circumcision issue; he learned nothing new from james, peter, and john, but they recognized that he had been empowered for an apostleship to the nations.
" (galatians 2:1-10).
‘scholar’:
Partly correct for the opening chapters of the book of Revelation but according to the events inspired by vision began from the lord's Day which we know commenced in 1914 CE which also concerned historical developments with the Lord's people- Jehovah's Witnesses.
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣
Obviously I won’t be taking advice from you about interpreting Revelation. The arrogant delusion that Revelation is about JWs gave me a good laugh though.
it-1 p. 493 communication - "when the circumcision issue was resolved by the governing body in jerusalem......".
it-1 p. 881 galatians, letter to the - "by reason of a revelation, paul, with barnabas and titus, went to jerusalem regarding the circumcision issue; he learned nothing new from james, peter, and john, but they recognized that he had been empowered for an apostleship to the nations.
" (galatians 2:1-10).
Duran:
The correct understanding is the 'appointed times of the nations' (gentile times) are 42 months/the 2nd woe and are future when the 8th king is given authority. That is the time of the GT and Jesus comes AFTER that time and that is when Rev 11:15/3rd woe is fulfilled.No. The 42 months (specifically the ‘trampling of the holy city’) was indeed the ‘great tribulation’ but it culminated in 70 CE. Jesus was expected to return shortly after (‘within a generation’ of his death) but he didn’t. Revelation is about the 1st and early 2nd centuries. The ’7th trumpet’ was simply a historical failure based on early Christian superstitions rather than ‘still future’. There’s no need to replace ‘scholar’s’ faulty superstitions with other faulty superstitions.
Still future:
Trumpets 1-5
Trumpet 6
Trumpet 7 (last trumpet)
it-1 p. 493 communication - "when the circumcision issue was resolved by the governing body in jerusalem......".
it-1 p. 881 galatians, letter to the - "by reason of a revelation, paul, with barnabas and titus, went to jerusalem regarding the circumcision issue; he learned nothing new from james, peter, and john, but they recognized that he had been empowered for an apostleship to the nations.
" (galatians 2:1-10).
Such analysis by Dr. Rolf Furuli a linguist in Semitics and used several astro programs was able to determine the following:
Furuli. 🤦♂️
13 sets of lunar observations matched 588 BCE and not 586 BCE
Poor 'scholar' seems to forget that I have personally checked all the observations. And it's 568 BCE doofus. Let's review the lunar observations for 588 BCE... even if we ignore the planetary observations, it's not good.
15 sets of planetary observations were backward calculations made to fit 586 for Neb's 37 the year
586 again?? Anyway... this is an assertion based on wishful thinking, not a determination based on evidence. Back in reality, all the planetary observations match 568 BCE perfectly, which is why 'scholar' and other Watch Tower Society shills are so keen to dismiss them.
it-1 p. 493 communication - "when the circumcision issue was resolved by the governing body in jerusalem......".
it-1 p. 881 galatians, letter to the - "by reason of a revelation, paul, with barnabas and titus, went to jerusalem regarding the circumcision issue; he learned nothing new from james, peter, and john, but they recognized that he had been empowered for an apostleship to the nations.
" (galatians 2:1-10).
‘scholar’:
Regarding the solstice, there remains the possibility that an intercalary month was inserted to fit the observations and the fact that solstices were not observed but calculated as stated by experts in ancient astronomy such as O. Neugebauer, A Sachs and R. Newton.
🤣😂🤣😂😂🤣😂🤣😂
An imaginary intercalary month can’t save you from an impossible solstice date that is about 10 days out in the Watch Tower Society’s broken interpretation. 🤦♂️
And I and others have previously dealt with all your other tedious apologetics too, including your straight out lies about the lunar observations.
it-1 p. 493 communication - "when the circumcision issue was resolved by the governing body in jerusalem......".
it-1 p. 881 galatians, letter to the - "by reason of a revelation, paul, with barnabas and titus, went to jerusalem regarding the circumcision issue; he learned nothing new from james, peter, and john, but they recognized that he had been empowered for an apostleship to the nations.
" (galatians 2:1-10).
🤦♂️
it’s too real. 🤣
‘scholar’ persistently demonstrates that JWs don’t actually care about truth at all.
it-1 p. 493 communication - "when the circumcision issue was resolved by the governing body in jerusalem......".
it-1 p. 881 galatians, letter to the - "by reason of a revelation, paul, with barnabas and titus, went to jerusalem regarding the circumcision issue; he learned nothing new from james, peter, and john, but they recognized that he had been empowered for an apostleship to the nations.
" (galatians 2:1-10).
‘scholar’:
Will do. Could you give me a reference list of recommended textx relating to this subject for scholar is hungry for knowledge.
Quit with the tedious cop out. You have internet anccess and you claim to be a ‘scholar’.
it-1 p. 493 communication - "when the circumcision issue was resolved by the governing body in jerusalem......".
it-1 p. 881 galatians, letter to the - "by reason of a revelation, paul, with barnabas and titus, went to jerusalem regarding the circumcision issue; he learned nothing new from james, peter, and john, but they recognized that he had been empowered for an apostleship to the nations.
" (galatians 2:1-10).
VAT 4956 (line 16 on the front) indicates the summer solstice on the 9th day of the 3rd month. During the Neo-Babylonian period, the Julian date of the summer solstice must fall within the range of 27–30 June. For 568 BCE, the 9th day of the 3rd month corresponds to 29 June, exactly as expected. However, because the Watch Tower Society claims that Nisan of 588 BCE began on 3 May, this would require that the summer solstice occurred on 9 July, which is impossible.
Now, go and educate yourself about solstices. (More realistically, let the projection and argument from ignorance continue 🤣.)
it-1 p. 493 communication - "when the circumcision issue was resolved by the governing body in jerusalem......".
it-1 p. 881 galatians, letter to the - "by reason of a revelation, paul, with barnabas and titus, went to jerusalem regarding the circumcision issue; he learned nothing new from james, peter, and john, but they recognized that he had been empowered for an apostleship to the nations.
" (galatians 2:1-10).
‘scholar’:
That is not what I asked. What I ask from you is simply ONE line of evidence that disproves 607 BCE.
🤦♂️ if that’s what you’re after, just stop reading after the first bit of evidence. 🤣
it-1 p. 493 communication - "when the circumcision issue was resolved by the governing body in jerusalem......".
it-1 p. 881 galatians, letter to the - "by reason of a revelation, paul, with barnabas and titus, went to jerusalem regarding the circumcision issue; he learned nothing new from james, peter, and john, but they recognized that he had been empowered for an apostleship to the nations.
" (galatians 2:1-10).
‘scholar’:
Seeing that the sources are robust could you then provide ONE line of evidence that disproves 607 BE?
Whenever ‘scholar’ plays this tedious game after already having been given mountains of evidence, it always reminds me of the “What have the Roman’s ever done for us?” scene from Life of Brian.
it-1 p. 493 communication - "when the circumcision issue was resolved by the governing body in jerusalem......".
it-1 p. 881 galatians, letter to the - "by reason of a revelation, paul, with barnabas and titus, went to jerusalem regarding the circumcision issue; he learned nothing new from james, peter, and john, but they recognized that he had been empowered for an apostleship to the nations.
" (galatians 2:1-10).
It would appear that aqwsed 12345 does not agree with you pushing the barrow on 587 BCE
It hardly matters. My assessment of the sources is factually robust, and I’m aware of the fallacious appeal to tradition that leads some to cling to the incorrect year.
