There is a seldom-used talk about the Flood... and for good reason.
When someone gave this talk at my kingdom hall, all the points he made rang hollow. None of the arguments seemed logical; it was the fault of the outline, not the speaker.
There were implausible lines of reasoning mentioned as 'could have's. For example, an earth covered by water 'could have' caused the formation of the large mountains we see today.
I was tired of emotional language being used in the publications and from the platform to support the flood, creation, etc... Key words are used to discredit 'scientists' as a whole, but any 'scientist' who's argument seems to agree with the wt is portrayed as a savior. I'll have to agree with Simon there.
I expressed some of my concerns (not by choice) to the presiding overseer. Our conversation was supposed to be confidential, and of course I was loath to mention my doubts to anyone at all. Well, of course, there was a talk soon thereafter:
'Anyone who doesn't believe in the ransom has no reason to be here!'
He spoke out to inspire dread (and I am sure he was afraid too), but he was right. It happened so quickly, but I knew the bible was not from any divine source and the JW organization was just a product of social evolution.
cellofloater
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke