From hibiscusfire: "What do you know about God?"
You first.
Yeah, and that's going to happen!
ewww I still have a sick taste in my mouth from hbf's last comment!
everything you know about god is wrong - the disinformation guide to religion.
new book recommend edited by russ kick published 2007. this is a new book just arrived i ordered on amazon.com isbn-10 1-932857-59-1. it is 387 a4?
pages long by various authors and a piece by dawkins.
From hibiscusfire: "What do you know about God?"
You first.
Yeah, and that's going to happen!
ewww I still have a sick taste in my mouth from hbf's last comment!
armegeddon has finally happened.i am sitting in my dorm room at bethel watching the total destruction of new york city.
the skyline of manhattan is in flames, here in brooklyn, not a building is standing.
hundreds of corpses lie about the street.
Hibiscusfire,
I was kind of hoping that perhaps your comment hadn't come across in the way that you meant it to and that I was mistaken, but I see you really are that pompous, arrogant, hypocritical and egotistical.
Keep this sort of quality posting up and you'll be challenging Tophat for her position.
armegeddon has finally happened.i am sitting in my dorm room at bethel watching the total destruction of new york city.
the skyline of manhattan is in flames, here in brooklyn, not a building is standing.
hundreds of corpses lie about the street.
Armageddon to me would be great
What a sickening comment, you think it's great? Which particular brand of religious nonsense are you?
Congratulations, I think that is the single most nauseatingly odious comment I have ever heard anyone say, have an award -
thinking out loud.... .
justice.. topics that need discussing.
justice is getting what you deserve.
If I design and create something new at work, who is to blame if it doesn't work? Me or the thing I've created. If I tell twenty people how to do something and they all get it wrong, are they to blame or do I have to take responsibility for not making clear what I expected of those people?
Someone needs to take some responsibility. Yeah, i'm looking at you, old guy with the white beard.
dear friends,.
lately i have been re-researching some things i learned as i was leaving the borg.
for lurkers and newbies, i thought i would share this with you.. apparently long before the flood of noah, was a story told and recorded on 12 clay tablets, of a flood so simular to noahs that it will be shocking to you if you have never read about it.
Come on JC don't let the godless heathens get you down, they're all going to burn in hell anyway.
i have a question about the attraction that exists between the sexes.. does anyone know if a study has been conducted that seeks to measure or quantify such an attraction?.
i need this for a project i'm working on.
thanks.. snowbird.
Yes HE did, thats all
It's that kind of high brow argument that has us atheists quaking in our collective boots!
from a logical point....i notice that in these threads that there are few here who dont believe in god..but i hate to tell you your dead wrong for having such an ignorant belief like that..instead ya,ll are blaming religion, people, and your personal problems for your lack of faith in god..thats dead wrong.
the non-believers are not looking at the whole picture..just the present..the things that go on in the world happen for a reason and it doesnt mean god doesnt exist.
the bible says "the fool has said in his heart god doesnt exist".
I was waiting with bated breath but there seems to be a distinct lack of empirical evidence for god on this thread.
I wonder which god he was going to prove the existence of?
M
'tough on gods, tough on the causes of gods'
i was inspired to go by a fellow poster on the board who encouraged me to examine atheism a little more closely.
i am glad i went.. (now if anyone wants to come here and encourage me to be religious, sorry i won't respond to that on this thread.
feel free to start your own thread about the wonders of belief.).
Gopher,
Congratulations, It's quite refreshing in here isn't it?
Greendawn
Though I don't agree with atheism every person is entitles to believe as they see fit. Most atheists are reasonable people though some nutters like Hitler were partly inspired by evolutionism when formulating their beastly policies eg the strong has the right to ruthlessly swallow up the weak.
Hmmm... perhaps that is what Hitler meant by the following quotes, (courtesy of www.brainyquote.com)
Who says I am not under the special protection of God?
Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator - by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.
As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice
GD, care to comment on that nutter being partly inspired by theism when formulating his beastly policies e.g. that his sky daddy is going to ruthlessly torture everyone who doesn't worship him? or was your comment a drive-by posting for the lord?
this is video is of high quality and well done and has over 2 million views which is bound to have a very big impact on public opinion,, thank god for the internet:.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=9%2f11+mysteries&total=633&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0.
oldflame
The Steele in those building were tested and rated for 3000 degrees.
Really? I would be really interested in using this material, Does it go by the trade name unobtanium?
RAF
when things collapse on several stages/floors there is a point of saturation which slow down the process ... even if the weight is still pushing it down
I've tried to think of several ways of saying this gently but you are wrong, loads high enough to cause failure do not have a 'saturation point'
For the pirate perspective,
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons
And if you want some real information,
no firestorms please.
but be honest.
do you think that we are of a lower level of intelligence than those who accept evolutionist' theories?.
There is the issue of internet forum based discussions being a little more feisty than most debates anyway but I think the main problem is that generally there is a huge gulf between what most atheists feel about theists and what an individual atheist feels about a particular line of argument.
There is a poster on this forum who insists on posting the most meaningless drivel on every thread on the subject of atheism and evolution without ever posting anything of worth, this particular poster gets quite a bit of stick for this. Does that mean that they deserve it for being a theist? No, clearly they get called an idiot for being incapable of rational argument. I personally will happily tell someone they are talking bollocks if that is what they are doing, but I fully respect peoples right to believe what they wish.
Theists and creationists have to expect to be called upon to back up their claims just as I would expect to be asked to back up my claims. My experience has been that generally, creationists fail to respond to such requests (unless you are counting 'bwahahahahaha' as a coherent response ) Based on that I find creationism (at least in the fundy YEC and ID brigade forms) to be a less than intellectual stimulating worldview and I have little time or patience for anyone who subscribes to such shallow egotistical nonsense as invariably the same people are usually incapable of adequately describing the theory they are arguing against.
However with all of that said I am fully aware that science is incapable of 'disproving' god and as such I have no argument other than Occam's razor against a god that kickstarted the big bang or abiogenesis, it's just a shame that the razor is rather unmerciful to supernatural creatures.
So I have no problem with creationists other than their propensity for talking rubbish on subjects they don't understand, other than that they're great!