what I am trying to say viv is that natural selection is starting to look a liittle strained (sic)
And as per usual you are wrong, even worse you think that others understand as little about the subject as you do.
evolution paints human ancestors covered with fur.
fur has several benefits as stated by britannica "the pelts of fur-bearing animals are called true furs when they consist of two elements: a dense undercoat, called ground hair, and longer hairs, extending beyond that layer, called guard hair.
the principal function of ground hair is to maintain the animal’s body temperature; that of guard hair is to protect the underlying fur and skin and to shed rain or snow.".
what I am trying to say viv is that natural selection is starting to look a liittle strained (sic)
And as per usual you are wrong, even worse you think that others understand as little about the subject as you do.
looking at the board, i see so many long threads on " evoultion vs creation " ect, ect.. therefore if " your" qualifications are only those of " an" uneducated j.w, may i ask one question?.
q) what makes you feel you are now qualified to comment with absolute ,authority on any discussion?.
i ask the above question because for most of us " ex-witnesses " logic is still words written in the pages of an awake" magazine.
My qualifications are not those of an 'uneducated JW' and I have read a lot of books on evolution. However I would have no problem with someone who doesn't have those advantages take part in a conversation on the subject. I would also add that if you are genuinely asking a question then there are quite a few people here who can give you a really good well-informed answer on the topic.
If you had an engineering question you would be better off asking me (an engineer) than the cleaner, the only difference between us is that I studied engineering. It's the same thing with evolution, studying the subject makes your opinion worth more than a layperson's opinion.
The really good thing about science is that if you don't agree then all you have to do is study it yourself and you can see the evidence. No scientist would suggest you accept something due to someone having the right credentials, they would suggest that having empirical evidence that supports a well reasoned theory is the pinnacle of science.
atheist delusion.
just want to know what the ex jw community thinks about this video and also offer my pov.
the video was actually an advertisement on here.
All the answers come but when those refuse the truth and say it's irrational, then there is no joy.
You must be some type of narcissists to say the things you say and not have no regret whatsoever. Evil.
You say that atheists have no joy and then start calling people narcissists and evil. I think it's looter who seems to have no joy.
atheist delusion.
just want to know what the ex jw community thinks about this video and also offer my pov.
the video was actually an advertisement on here.
Looter, still no empirical evidence? I thought in the OP you claimed to have answers to all objections?
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
The Rebel,
I think you'll find there is only one person who isn't having fun on this thread!
ok. i know this has been brought up in the past, but i have often wondered who in our halls are awake (for those of us who attend).
there are some i would consider a 'maybe', but no way of ever really knowing.. so here is my idea.
i hope it doesn't sound too masonic,.
OP When you have that sorted I have some cats that need herding!
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Caedes, I actually went to the trouble of checking your last few contributions towards the thread in case I missed something.
Good grief, that kind of in depth research must have taken you hours. You still haven't answered any of the perfectly reasonable questions I have asked about your claims. You do understand this is a discussion board not a pulpit?
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Has anyone heard of the phrase 'when you are in a hole it's best to stop digging'? It seems relevant somehow.
now we all have heard how the universe is composed of matter and space.
and we always here of how it had a beginning.
but really what could have begun it?
As mere mortals mankind knows nothing.
Does that mean you have evidence for the existence of immortals?
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Come on Vidqun, why should anyone follow your advice? why should anyone believe anything you have to say?