ThirdWitness:
If you believe the Bible then 607 is the only date possible. If you put secular historians interpretations over the Bible then believe 587 or whatever year you want to believe because it doesn't matter since you make God's word invalid.
Again with the false dichotomies
So you are now reduced to one point and that point involves declaring the Bible to be wrong. You prove our point. 587 proponents must disregard the Bible to prove 587.
And again...
You are so programmed into witness-thought that you`re not even aware that you are doing it, are you. You think like this to save your own faith, not in God, but in the Watchtower Society! And you speak like this because you have been programmed into speaking like this, as an effort to persuade others (those on the brink of freedom from your mindcontrol-cult) to stay in the organisation and in the robot-like "life".
There are hundreds of millions of christians in the world who are christians, believing the Bible fully, without having to rewrite history into something that never happened to believe. This is because they never believed in your insane 1914-doctrine. I believe what you meant to say in your above post, was "If you believe in the Watchtower Societys calculations, then 607 is the right date, because it`s the only date that gets us to 1914, and never mind that the day-for-a-year-rule (which isn`t even a rule), is never mentioned about the 2520 days or in Daniel at all". I believe this is what you really meant to say. In fact, you, by this, spitting on the Bible itself, as you are by this equating the Bible with the Watchtower Society. And I don`t think God likes that you are doing that.