JosephMalik:
You seem to think the text was written with precision and protected by God in this way? That is your argument but anyone should be able to see that God did not protect the text in this way.
First of all: I am arguing this from a christian perspective, even though I don`t consider myself a christian myself (at least not friday nights...)
From a christian perspective: If God didn`t protect the text, at least thru the first couple of hundred years, then the text can`t be trusted at all. To me it`s an either/or-question. If God (by some kind of guidance/intervention) didn`t protect the texts, at least in the beginning, how can it be trusted? It could have been changed beyond recognition, the text could say anything, things we would even consider heresy/ungodly today! The JWs could even (principally) be right in their horrible mistranslation of the Bible! (they could be right by chance) And as for hermeneutical approaches, I have nothing but contempt for that. There is no (stabile) cultural bond between ourselves and the first christian congregations, or any part of humanity, 2000 years ago, for that matter. And if we had to second-guess or way thru 2000 years of culture to be able to determine what the Bible really says,I doubt that would be possible.
You see regardless of how it was written, it was not copied with precision much less translated thus. There are many variations, additions or versions some of which are difficult to resolve.
I am aware that there are many variations, but as I have no knowledge of greek, I don`t know what these differences are. Are there diverging texts on key issues (I would regard all paragraps concerning Jesus words about himself, "Ego eimi", things like that, key issues, whereas whether Onan "spilleth his seed on the floor" or "spilleth his seed on the table" is not a key issue), or just "small differences"?
The Cannon itself is a best guess
If that is the case, then there is no christianity. There might be "religion", based upon old greek and hebrew texts, but christianity as we know it today, would be a complete heresy (speaking from a christian viewpoint).
The protection is somewhere else and is not compromised by such alteration or those responsible for it
Hm, I`m not sure what you mean by that. That there is an "untouchable" version of the Bible, in heaven? Like the Quran, which moslems claim is only a "materialised" version of an allready pre-existing text in heaven? Ok,I have no problem with that. But that would mean that God revealed himself to man,made sure the account was written down, only to get out and leave the rest up to us, not caring if the account of his visit would be corrupted until it wasn`t any longer recognisable, leaving countless generations stumbling around in the dark after some sense of truth.
However, I`m not saying I completely disagree with you. I just disagree with you when discussing this with the "christian part" of me. I know that from a non-christian perspective, what you say makes perfect sense. But it would alter the world and 2000 years of christianity completely, with huge theological implications.