Nicodemus you wrote:
"The second question asks whether the candidate clearly understands that their baptism identifies them as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Since there can be no disputing that their baptism does so identify them, simply asking them whether they understand that does not strike me as particularly heinous. Perhaps one of our astute ex-Bethelites can shed some more light on this issue. I suspect that there may have been legal reasons for this. I honestly don’t find it as offensive as some do."
A different slant on the issue with the new baptism question has to do with the words "spirit directed". Is it spirit directed? What does that mean? I asked that to an elder and their explanation was:
"Since the Bible was inspired by God's Spirit and since we follow the Bible as an organization we are a spirit-directed organization...."
Is this an acceptable explanation? Or is it a twist and a stretch? Why make the statement which infers that god's spirit is directing the organization? The action is wrong - is it a pull or a push action? I don't know if this jumps out to everyone like it does to me....
If it is a spirit directed organization and the spirt is doing the directing (not the Society's interperetation of the spirit inspired scriptures) then how do we explain the fact that the light needs to get brighter? What doesn't the spirit know?
Ok lets anticipate the answer "it's not a person - its God's active force". Well - if its God's Active Force then God is responsible....Why does God need the light to get brighter? Why doesn't he stop incorrect light from getting through and being published if it is his spirit that is responsible for the words? Surely his credibility is at stake?
Or is it just a phrase?
Please help me understand this correctly.
Thanks