Hey Simon. Long time no speak, where have you been? Anyway, I've PM'd you about moderating proper like. Oh, if you need more of those 'happy' pills just PM me and I'll 'sort you out'. ;o)
Have you guys seen my new website!?
a perennial issue for any online forum is moderation and applying rules.
we have a set of community guidelines and posting guidelines that are intended to make clear what is and isn't acceptable but this tends to focus on the obvious standards of behavior for, well, obvious reasons.
it's easy to talk about people being aggressive or insulting etc... as those are common and clearly unwanted behaviors and the typical issue for online communities - the most likely things to come up.. does this mean that everything *not* on the list is allowed?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bhhs5lhr00.
words.....just cant find the words......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ja4z2-sf4ky.
when somebody posted this on fb, i was anxious to see how ridiculous it would be, probably worse then the gb prophecies, etc.
after watching the clip, i honestly don't know what to believe.
at the very least it's very entertaining and interesting.
sugar water will show blue light over the sun.. salt water will show red light over the sun.. our body components, salt sugar water.. blue blood vein and red blood... definition of our body in his form.. this is the evidence, of our god..
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Jesus that's proof
I haven't a clue
based on what we've seen, it seems to me that of the seven, splane and jackson are the smartest; herd, lett and morris the least intelligent; and sanderson and losch somewhere in the middle.
.
what's your impression?.
Hang on, it does not matter how smart they are, they are being guided by Jeehoover; though not Inspired (tm) though .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heuj4y-xoey&feature=youtu.be.
supposedly, the boy is from canada and aged 10, and the girl is from hongkong and aged 7.. the youtube comments carry accusations of digital manipulation, read if you want or just enjoy..
so now that most of us have come to a semi truthful understanding that the witnesses are wrong about evolutionist, there is a certain question that i have always had.
now if you were to ask any jw, they'd recite a complete fallacy from scientist regarding this.
but what is you guys input of this.
Caupon: In my experience the fact that some science is difficult to understand provides an opportunity for young earth creationists (for example) to offer flawed, incorrect or oversimplified explanations of the science to fit their viewpoint. Creationist often point out the flaws in the dating methods as if to say science ignores these issues, when this is not the case.
A video that gives an understanding of K-Ar dating: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMZ5kJEviD0
so now that most of us have come to a semi truthful understanding that the witnesses are wrong about evolutionist, there is a certain question that i have always had.
now if you were to ask any jw, they'd recite a complete fallacy from scientist regarding this.
but what is you guys input of this.
Caupon: Only the religious promise absolute truth. Science can only offer models or theories that best fit the facts. With regards dates far in the past 'the 65 million years' issue, it should be obvious these dates are estimates with a tolerances applied. Now given the science behind how these dates calculated... it seems to me you have only a few possible options available to discount them, for example
So I am curious Caupon, what is your reasoning behind your rejection? If you tell the board we can better understand what the issues are.