auld soul,
or anyone else for that matter. can you point out any other government, social agency, or any other organization, besides the united nations, that uses the term ngo? if the united nations are the only ones; then anytime the term is used you are by definition associating with the un...the un has no reason or interest to list anyone as an ngo unless there is an association. i don't know about where you live but around here the "volunteer" fire department is a governmental agency with a taxing district and other government funds being available. but the only ones that would consider any organization an NGO is the UNITED NATIONS. if there are any governments, organizations, religions, corporations, or individuals, other than auld soul, that use the term NGO in anyway not connected to the UN, please give us their names.
as far as doctrine is concerned...the only doctrine that the wtb&ts is truly concerned is the doctrine of cover your own ass, all other doctrines are subject to change. auld soul your comment about individuals not being organizations is only true to a point, individuals represent organizations. as far as educating people is concerned, please educate those who don't know; what are the chances of a member of the wtb&ts registering at a united nations conference on their own?
j2s