Excellent work!
This is my current favourite quote from one of the linked documents ("Page numbers will not match your computer. Look for page numbers that are circled in scans;FADT 124 and FADT 125------takes a few seconds to download. http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/joint/commttee/j2444.pdf "):
Excerpt of remarks made by Mr Vincent Joseph Toole, Legal Officer, Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Australia in response to a hearing before the (OMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA) Official Committee Hansard Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade [Reference: Australia’s efforts to promote and protect freedom of religion and belief) on Friday, 15 October 1999
___________________________
"Mr Toole—I guess so, and I guess it is the same thing—you will disagree but yet you are the best of friends. That is the view we take. The fact that people do not necessarily share our particular understanding and they think, ‘Oh no, that is the not the way I want to believe it,’ is fine. We are really trying to educate people and teach tolerance. That really is getting at the very root cause of the problem. It is fanaticism that causes some of these problems, where people have a singular view that their way is right and woe betide anybody who disagrees with it. It gets to the stage, when you start having that elevated to a level of government, where you have a very dangerous situation because then you are only one step away from totalitarianism, where you have people in high places deciding what you can and cannot believe on a whole host of things.
Tying in with your question before about what should governments do, I would have thought in a free society that people should be able to have whatever beliefs they want unless they become detrimental or positively disruptive to society at large. The price we pay for a free society is to allow people to have whatever opinions they want, unless it gets to the stage where they are destroying the public order. Now, whether or not it is destroying the public order should be a matter for objective analysis, not a subjective, bigoted type of imposition of other people’s wills."