Dickelentz said:
God gave Adam and Eve freewill. He could have created them robots, but instead gave them a choice. They chose not to trust God in the only area he put restrictions on. The consequence was that they lost that personal and intimate relationship God wanted to have with them.
This is one of the more brain dead arguments that theist trot out, because without it God would be evil for allowing badness. However, "passing the buck" to humans simply isn't fair. God only wants us to behave a certain way, but yet he designed us with the proclivity to act another way. If I wanted my kids to eat healthy foods, I would try to ensure that I provided an environment that is conducive to them eating healthy. I would only buy and serve healthy foods to my kids as I know this would be best for them. Would my not providing them with junk food alternatives infringe on their "free will" or make them into "robots"? In the context of healthy eating, maybe yes, but if the alternative of eating junkfood would kill them (like disobeying God does), then does that not make me justified? If God knows that giving us "free will" would result in our destruction, then he's just as evil as the parent who allows the kid to eat junk food and die.
The free will is only "free" if there are no adverse consequences for picking one or another chioce. It's "free will" to pick an apple or orange to assuage hunger. It's not "free will" to pick between an apple and a stone for the same purposes, and you're not being a "robot" for picking the only viable option.
In the "worship God" vs. "don't worship God" scenario, there's only one viable option according to the bible, since the "don't worship God" option results in eternal destruction. The presence of a non viable option doesn't denote the presence of "free-will". If your father told you "you either choose to become a plummer as a profession (worship God) or I will kill you." You're free to choose either to become a plummer or not, but is it really "free will" to not become a plummer(let's presume the father can follow through on his threat)? Of course not.
So God giving us free will only gave us the "ability to mess up" because his true purpose is to make us "robots" anyway, because he only wants us to do as he says. If God respected our free will to worship him or not, that would be one thing, and that would truly be "free will" as there are equal consequences for an action (worshipping God). But since God only wants us to do one thing anyway, the invention of "free will" is only something that can mess us up, something only an evil parent would do.
If you try to say free will is the only way God would know if we love him or not, then he should save himself the time and only create creatures with minds that want to love him, since that's what he wants anyway. Eternally punishing people because they don't believe in a historically inaccurate and sometimes cruel book, and hence don't want to love that deity, is pure evil on God's part. He already knew before I was born that I would/would not worship him, so he obviously likes to see people suffer.
Go therefore and baptize the people in the name of the father and of the son... what the hell, we just need to bring up the yearbook numbers!