RWC says:
First he was a Nazirite from birth. That means through his parents they made a vow that he would never drink wine, never cut his hair, and never have contact with the dead. The fact that he attributed his strength to his hair was really attributing it to God through the vow that he had made.If Samson was attributing his strength directly to God, he would have said so ( a la Solomon and is wisdom, or was his wisdom only good as long as he grew his beard? ). If his hair had nothing to do with it, then it wouldn't have been mentioned (why was he still strong while having illicit sex with Deliliah when his hair was still long? If it was "all about God" he would have lost his strength from the time he started doing Delilah). If it was "all about God" he would have told Deliliah "YHWH is responsible for my strength, and my continued good relationship with him is all that keeps me strong." But he didn't say that, did he? I wonder why?
Second, the text makes it clear that the reason he finally gave in to Delilah was because she nagged him everyday about it until he was tired to death. Who hasn't done that in their lifetime.Are you serious? We may give in on insignificant issues, but who the hell compromises on possible life endangering issues? (Wife ask husband "can I chop of your legs?". After wife ask this question several times husband gets tired of her nagging and allows her to harm him. Sounds realistic.) Samson must have been a real ass to not see that Delilah was ploting against him all that time. This tells me that Samson was either a real idiot, or this is just another ancient fable trying to tell a moral but nontheless employing totally unrealistic logic (or Deliliah was really good in the sack ).
Third he lost his strength, not because of his hair, but because the Lord had left him for breaking his vow.Appearantly "sleeping with the enemy" is acceptable to God, but heavens forbid your hair get involuntarily cut off (albeit you were an ass for not seeing it coming ). As was alrealdy brought up, why was it necessary for his hair to grow back for him to bring down the pillars in the palace? If the hair was just a symbol, why wasn't it portrayed as one in the bible and not only by mordern apologist?
The fact that the Philistines would allow his hair to grow back was because they didn't believe in God and because they had left him to rot in prison. Only when they thought that they were invincible did they call for him to come to the party where he killed them.They didn't believe in YHWH?(Not worship Him but acknoweledge that he was the real "source of strength", much like many of the Isrealites enemies acknowledged YHWH but still mocked him for whatever reason.) So I guess it really was understood that the hair was the real source of strength? If so, they should have been especially vigilant to make sure that this guys hair would never grow back. Did they forget what he did with the jawbone of a donkey ? This guy was dangerous when armed (with hair). It would be the equivalent of us arming dangerous criminals. Apparently, both Samson and the Philistines were real dimwits who both deserved death .
Don't know much about the "fox thing" but quite interesting. Good points, Simon. When are you going to turn back on editying ?
Go therefore and baptize the people in the name of the father and of the son... what the hell, we just need to bring up the yearbook numbers!