Mary said:
Sorry, but I don't have any sympathy for this kid.........he SIGNED something saying he believed in a higher power.......in other words, he lied.
Not quite so, from the article it says:
He had declared his atheism to the Scout leaders overseeing his Eagle Scout application last year, but was still granted the award.
"They commended me on my honesty," he said.
So the Scout leaders already knew he was an atheist, even commending him, and still allowed him to be an eagle scout. Now all of a sudden, they change the rules on him and expect him to lie about what he believes?
Of course I agree that the Scouts should be able to dictate who can be a member. I just think it's sad that they use such stupid methodology to choose members, though. Belief in god is not needed to be a moral person; the boy should be judged on his actions and not his beliefs. But I'm especially upset at the fact that they essentially "changed the rules in the middle of the game", and are now rejecting a person who has long made his beliefs known, but has nontheless long been accepted and respected by the group.
BTW, kids are never kicked out just for praying in public schools. I went to public schools in very liberal New York City; I knew lots of kids who prayed organized on school grounds and never were suspended, expelled or even harassed. School sponsored prayer is what is illegal, as the government (through public schools), should not be endorsing religious beliefs in violation of the Constitution. I actually have no problem with school sanctioned daily "moments of silence", though I understand why more rabid church state seperationist are opposed to it. Just as long as outright prayer isn't there, I'm satisfied .